Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37263792›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2023

Target-Distractor Competition Modulates Saccade Trajectories in Space and Object Space.

Caroline Giuricich, Robert J Green, Heather Jordan, Mazyar Fallah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Dynamics of Saccade Trajectory Modulation by Distractors: Neural Activity Patterns in the Frontal Eye Field.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Coupling of saccade plans to endogenous attention during urgent choices.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Editorial: Rising stars in systems neuroscience: 2022.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Oculomotor feature discrimination is cortically mediated.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Caroline GiuricichSchool of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1356-8474
Robert J GreenCentre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada.
Heather JordanSchool of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada.
Mazyar FallahSchool of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada mfallah@uoguelph.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saccade planning and execution can be affected by a multitude of factors present in a target selection task. Recent studies have shown that the similarity between a target and nearby distractors affects the curvature of saccade trajectories, because of target-distractor competition. To further understand the nature of this competition, we varied the distance between and the similarity of complex target and distractor objects in a delayed match-to-sample task to examine their effects on human saccade trajectories and better understand the underlying neural circuitry. For trials with short saccadic reaction times (SRTs) when target-distractor competition is still active, the distractor is attractive and saccade trajectories are deviated toward the distractor. We found a robust effect of distance consistent with saccade vector averaging, whereas the effect of similarity suggested the existence of an object-based suppressive surround. At longer SRTs, there was sufficient time for competition between the objects to complete and the distractor to be repulsive, which resulted in saccade trajectory deviations away from the distractor exhibiting the effects of a spatial suppressive surround. In terms of similarity, as the target-distractor similarity decreased, the initial saccade angle shifted toward the target, reflecting stronger distractor inhibition. There were no interactions between distance and similarity at any point in the time course of target-distractor competition. Together, saccade trajectories reflect target-distractor competition that is affected independently by both spatial and object space suppressive surrounds. The differences in saccade trajectories at short and long SRTs distinguish between active and completed decision-making processes.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalSaccadesHumansPhotic StimulationReaction Timeattentioncompetitonobject representationsaccade trajectorysuppressive surroundstarget selection

Identifiers

PMID37263792
PMCPMC10275402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.