Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37263698›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Consideration of sex and gender in European clinical practice guidelines in internal medicine: a systematic review protocol.

Awa Naghipour, Marcel Gemander, Eva Becher, Sabine Oertelt-Prigione

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Awa NaghipourDepartment of Sex and Gender Sensitive Medicine, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3818-1583
Marcel GemanderBielefeld Center for Data Science, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Eva BecherDepartment of Sex and Gender Sensitive Medicine, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Sabine Oertelt-PrigioneDepartment of Sex and Gender Sensitive Medicine, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany sabine.oertelt-prigione@uni-bielefeld.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionClinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are a powerful instrument to ensure evidence-based practice in clinical diagnostics and disease management. As knowledge about the impact of sex and gender on health and disease is emerging, the need for its transfer into clinical practice is becoming more urgent. However, a systematic evaluation of the incorporation of sex-related and gender-related knowledge into CPGs in Europe is currently not available. This systematic review will fill this gap. We will analyse the operationalisation of sex and gender in internal medicine CPGs in Europe and the translation of this information into tailored recommendations. The results will offer a baseline assessment to inform prospective sex-sensitive and gender-sensitive guideline development. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: CPGs published by European internal medicine guidelines will be analysed according to a pre-established analysis framework. CPGs will be identified by a two-step approach, that is, through direct contact with the organisations and by a PubMed search, to ensure capture of all relevant guidelines. Prespecified keywords will be employed to identify the representation of sex-related and gender-related content throughout the CPGs. Structured data will be collected through machine-assisted text mining. Identified texts will then be manually reviewed by two independent coders using a specifically developed checklist. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study does not require approval by an ethics board. It will provide an overview of sex and gender considerations in European CPGs in the field of internal medicine regarding the time frame 2012-2022.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based PracticeEuropeFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesSystematic Reviews as Topicinternal medicinepatient-centered careprotocols & guidelinessexual and gender minorities

Identifiers

PMID37263698
PMCPMC10254592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.