Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37263691›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Novel application of multi-facility process map analysis for rapid injury care health system assessment in Northern Malawi.

John Whitaker, Abena S Amoah, Albert Dube, Lindani Chirwa, Boston Munthali, Rory F Rickard, Andrew J M Leather, Justine Davies

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

John WhitakerInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK j.whitaker@bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5877-4496
Abena S AmoahFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2270-1871
Albert DubeMalawi Epidemiological and Intervention Research Unit, Chilumba, Malawi.
Lindani ChirwaKaronga District Health Office, Karonga, Malawi.
Boston MunthaliLilongwe Institute of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Rory F RickardAcademic Department of Military Surgery and Trauma, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham, UK.
Andrew J M LeatherKing's Centre for Global Health and Health Partnerships, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0500-5962
Justine DaviesInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6834-1838

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe used the process mapping method and Three Delays framework, to identify and visually represent the relationship between critical actions, decisions and barriers to access to care following injury in the Karonga health system, Northern Malawi.

designFacilitated group process mapping workshops with summary process mapping synthesis.

settingProcess mapping workshops took place in 11 identified health system facilities (one per facility) providing injury care for a population in Karonga, Northern Malawi.

participantsFifty-four healthcare workers from various cadres took part.

resultsAn overall injury health system summary map was created using those categories of action, decision and barrier that were sometimes or frequently reported. This provided a visual summary of the process following injury within the health system. For Delay 1 (seeking care) four barriers were most commonly described (by 8 of 11 facilities) these were 'cultural norms', 'healthcare literacy', 'traditional healers' and 'police processes'. For Delay 2 (reaching care) the barrier most frequently described was 'transport'-a lack of timely affordable emergency transport (formal or informal) described by all 11 facilities. For Delay 3 (receiving quality care) the most commonly reported barrier was that of 'physical resources' (9 of 11 facilities).

conclusionsWe found our novel approach combining several process mapping exercises to produce a summary map to be highly suited to rapid health system assessment identifying barriers to injury care, within a Three Delays framework. We commend the approach to others wishing to conduct rapid health system assessments in similar contexts.

Indexed as

Health FacilitiesQuality of Health CareCosts and Cost AnalysisHealth PersonnelHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMalawihealth services administration & managementstatistics & research methodstrauma management

Identifiers

PMID37263691
PMCPMC10255326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.