Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37263674›Full record

ArticleBMJ case reports2023

Laterally extended endopelvic resection as part of the surgical management of disseminated retroperitoneal leiomyomatosis mimicking low-grade sarcoma in a patient with a solitary kidney.

Maaedah Khan, Sally Eltawab, William Gietzmann, Hooman Soleymani Majd

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maaedah KhanDepartment of Gynaecology Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4953-4316
Sally EltawabDepartment of Gynaecology Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9335-8890
William GietzmannDepartment of Urology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Hooman Soleymani MajdDepartment of Gynaecology Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK hooman.soleymanimajd@msd.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3293-5321
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leiomyomas are common benign uterine smooth muscle tumours. Rarer subsets may demonstrate aggressive extrauterine growth which mimic metastatic disease. We discuss the case of a female patient in her 40s, with a long-standing atrophic right kidney, presenting with a 17 cm uterine mass demonstrating bilateral para-aortic and pelvic sidewall spread. Although biopsies favoured the diagnosis of a benign tumour, a leiomyosarcoma could not be excluded. The surgical complexity of the case was compounded by a tumour residing close to the only functioning kidney and engulfment of the inferior mesenteric artery. The surgical procedures indicated were a radical hysterectomy, the laterally extended endopelvic resection procedure to achieve clear margins in the pelvic sidewall and a left hemicolectomy. In the absence of formal guidelines, we present this challenging case to provide clarity into the histological assessment and surgical management of rare leiomyomas, as well as an overview of the current literature.

Indexed as

LeiomyomatosisSolitary KidneyUterine NeoplasmsAbdomenFemaleHumansHysterectomyPelvisGynecological cancerObstetrics and gynaecologySurgery

Identifiers

PMID37263674
PMCPMC10254902
OpenAlexW4379015992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.