Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37262063›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among women planning for pregnancy, pregnant or breastfeeding mothers in Jordan: A cross-sectional study.

Rami Masa'deh, Aaliyah Momani, Ahmad Rayan, Shaher H Hamaideh, Omayma M Masadeh, Nabeel Al-Yateem

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Rami Masa'dehSchool of Nursing, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0003-2762-7375
Aaliyah MomaniSchool of Nursing, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0001-9495-7564
Ahmad RayanSchool of Nursing, Zarqa University, Zarqa, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0002-8377-2297
Shaher H HamaidehFaculty of Nursing, Community and Mental Health Nursing Department, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0002-3122-2584
Omayma M MasadehRelief International, Amman, Jordan.
Nabeel Al-YateemDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Applied Science Private University · JOHashemite University · JOUnited Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East · JOUniversity of Sharjah · AEZarqa University · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen planning to become pregnant, who are pregnant, and who are breastfeeding are more hesitant to take COVID-19 vaccines compared to other women globally.

aimThis study investigates COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among women, who are planning for pregnancy, currently pregnant, and breastfeeding women in Jordan.

methodsAn online cross-sectional study was conducted in the biggest three cities in Jordan, including 874 women.

resultsWomen who were planning for pregnancy, pregnant, or breastfeeding reported statistically significant lower levels of perception of the seriousness of COVID-19 (7.12 ± 0.72, 7.53 ± 1.80, 7.2439 ± 7296, respectively), significant lower levels of perceived benefits of the vaccine (8.92 ± 2.15, 8.73 ± 1.93, 9.09 ± 2.10, respectively), significant lower levels of motivation and causes of action (7.15 ± 1.71, 6.7524 ± 1.40, 7.27 ± 1.68, respectively), and significantly higher levels of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy (31.32 ± 6.40, 30.11 ± 4.49, 30.27 ± 6.29, respectively) than other women. Married women, those whoe were previously infected with COVID-19, and those who had chronic diseases reported statistically significant lower levels of perception of COVID-19 seriousness, perceived benefits of COVID-19 vaccine, motivation to take COVID-19 vaccine, and causes of action, and significantly higher levels of hesitancy to take COVID-19 vaccine than unmarried women, those who have not been infected with COVID-19, and those who were medically healthy (p<0.001). There were statistically significant positive correlations between perception, perceived benefits, motivation, and cause of action with years of education; and statistically significant negative correlations between perception, perceived benefits, motivation, and cause of action with age (p<0.001).

conclusionsWomen who were planning for pregnancy, pregnant, or breastfeeding in Jordan showed miderate scores in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy despite the current international recommendations for its safety for women and their foetuses or neonates.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesBreast FeedingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornJordanPregnancyPregnant PeopleVaccinationCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID37262063
PMCPMC10234543
OpenAlexW4379053172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.