Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37261958›Full record

ArticleEndocrine reviews2023

Reevaluating the Role of Progesterone in Ovarian Cancer: Is Progesterone Always Protective?

Laura J Mauro, Angela Spartz, Julia R Austin, Carol A Lange

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Dienogest use and the risk of breast and gynecologic cancers: A nationwide population-based study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Biological characteristics of spontaneous ovarian cancer inZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura J MauroDepartment of Animal Science-Physiology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4372-8299
Angela SpartzMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Julia R AustinMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Carol A LangeMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2751-3976
University of Minnesota · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

TRAINING GRANT IN MICROBIOLOGY/CANCER RESEARCHT32CA009138 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Scott M. Dehm · 1985 to 2026
$11.3M
Progesterone Receptor (PR) Signaling Cross Talk Drives ER+ Breast CancerR01CA229697 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Carol A Lange, Douglas Yee · 2020 to 2026
$3.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA229697NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian cancer (OC) represents a collection of rare but lethal gynecologic cancers where the difficulty of early detection due to an often-subtle range of abdominal symptoms contributes to high fatality rates. With the exception of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, OC most often manifests as a post-menopausal disease, a time in which the ovaries regress and circulating reproductive hormones diminish. Progesterone is thought to be a "protective" hormone that counters the proliferative actions of estrogen, as can be observed in the uterus or breast. Like other steroid hormone receptor family members, the transcriptional activity of the nuclear progesterone receptor (nPR) may be ligand dependent or independent and is fully integrated with other ubiquitous cell signaling pathways often altered in cancers. Emerging evidence in OC models challenges the singular protective role of progesterone/nPR. Herein, we integrate the historical perspective of progesterone on OC development and progression with exciting new research findings and critical interpretations to help paint a broader picture of the role of progesterone and nPR signaling in OC. We hope to alleviate some of the controversy around the role of progesterone and give insight into the importance of nPR actions in disease progression. A new perspective on the role of progesterone and nPR signaling integration will raise awareness to the complexity of nPRs and nPR-driven gene regulation in OC, help to reveal novel biomarkers, and lend critical knowledge for the development of better therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinEstrogensFemaleHumansProgesteroneReceptors, ProgesteroneBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanEstrogensProgesteroneReceptors, ProgesteroneBRCA1/2fallopian tubeovarian cancerprogesteroneprogesterone receptortranscription

Identifiers

PMID37261958
PMCPMC11048595
OpenAlexW4378976143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.