Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37261891›Full record

ArticleJMIR infodemiology2023

Establishing Infodemic Management in Germany: A Framework for Social Listening and Integrated Analysis to Report Infodemic Insights at the National Public Health Institute.

T Sonia Boender, Paula Helene Schneider, Claudia Houareau, Silvan Wehrli, Tina D Purnat, Atsuyoshi Ishizumi, Elisabeth Wilhelm, Christopher Voegeli, Lothar H Wieler, Christina Leuker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR infodemiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Applications, challenges and a trustworthy use of artificial intelligence in public health].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Informing social media analysis for public health: a cross-sectional survey of professionals.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

T Sonia BoenderRisk Communication Unit, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4418-3713
Paula Helene SchneiderRisk Communication Unit, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7513-1342
Claudia HouareauDepartment for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7532-4956
Silvan WehrliCentre for Artificial Intelligence in Public Health Research, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3377-1890
Tina D PurnatHealth Emergencies Programme, Department of Pandemic and Epidemic Preparedness and Prevention, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0257-6631
Atsuyoshi IshizumiHealth Emergencies Programme, Department of Pandemic and Epidemic Preparedness and Prevention, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9678-5372
Elisabeth WilhelmSchool of Public Health Information Futures Lab, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4641-516X
Christopher VoegeliCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1217-402X
Lothar H WielerRobert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4365-3717
Christina LeukerRisk Communication Unit, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2337-3785
Robert Koch Institute · DEWorld Health Organization · CHBrown University · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USHasso Plattner Institute · DE

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo respond to the need to establish infodemic management functions at the national public health institute in Germany (Robert Koch Institute, RKI), we explored and assessed available data sources, developed a social listening and integrated analysis framework, and defined when infodemic management functions should be activated during emergencies.

objectiveWe aimed to establish a framework for social listening and integrated analysis for public health in the German context using international examples and technical guidance documents for infodemic management.

methodsThis study completed the following objectives: identified (potentially) available data sources for social listening and integrated analysis; assessed these data sources for their suitability and usefulness for integrated analysis in addition to an assessment of their risk using the RKI's standardized data protection requirements; developed a framework and workflow to combine social listening and integrated analysis to report back actionable infodemic insights for public health communications by the RKI and stakeholders; and defined criteria for activating integrated analysis structures in the context of a specific health event or health emergency.

resultsWe included and classified 38% (16/42) of the identified and assessed data sources for social listening and integrated analysis at the RKI into 3 categories: social media and web-based listening data, RKI-specific data, and infodemic insights. Most data sources can be analyzed weekly to detect current trends and narratives and to inform a timely response by reporting insights that include a risk assessment and scalar judgments of different narratives and themes.

conclusionsThis study identified, assessed, and prioritized a wide range of data sources for social listening and integrated analysis to report actionable infodemic insights, ensuring a valuable first step in establishing and operationalizing infodemic management at the RKI. This case study also serves as a roadmap for others. Ultimately, once operational, these activities will inform better and targeted public health communication at the RKI and beyond.

Indexed as

communicationhealth promotioninfodemicinfodemic insightsinfodemiologyintegrated analysismisinformationpublic healthsocial listening

Identifiers

PMID37261891
PMCPMC10273031
OpenAlexW4366961034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.