Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37261814›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2023

An Open-label Phase I Study of GDC-0927 in Postmenopausal Women with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.

Sarat Chandarlapaty, Maura N Dickler, Jose Alejandro Perez Fidalgo, Rafael Villanueva-Vázquez, Jennifer Giltnane, Mary Gates, Ching-Wei Chang, Sravanthi Cheeti, Jill Fredrickson, Xiaojing Wang and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Pharmacodynamic Activity of [JCO precision oncology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarat ChandarlapatyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-4532-8053
Maura N DicklerMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-4631-6572
Jose Alejandro Perez FidalgoHospital Clinico Universitario of Valencia, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3568-4345
Rafael Villanueva-VázquezInstitut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4730-6886
Jennifer GiltnaneGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0002-8333-9995
Mary GatesGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.ORCID 0009-0006-8576-2769
Ching-Wei ChangGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0001-9239-4403
Sravanthi CheetiGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0003-2933-6328
Jill FredricksonGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0002-2693-4309
Xiaojing WangGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0003-1575-3227
Ann CollierGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0003-3410-3238
Heather M MooreGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0002-7098-3888
Ciara MetcalfeGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0001-7233-661X
Jennifer LauchleGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.ORCID 0009-0000-5423-0627
Eric W HumkeGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0002-1137-8557
Aditya BardiaMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-4885-1157
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USIGM Biosciences (United States) · USINCLIVA Health Research Institute · ESInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Targeting Polθ to Overcome PARP Inhibitor Resistance in Homologous Recombination Deficient Breast CancerP50CA247749 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Simon N. Powell · 2020 to 2026
$16.3M
Defining mechanisms of resistance to hormonal therapy in breast cancerR01CA234361 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI CHANDARLAPATY, SARAT, SOLIT, DAVID B. · 2019 to 2023
$2.0M
Therapeutic approaches to ER mutant breast cancerR01CA204999 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI CHANDARLAPATY, SARAT · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA247749NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204999NCI NIH HHS R01 CA234361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGDC-0927 is a novel, potent, nonsteroidal, orally bioavailable, selective estrogen receptor (ER) degrader that induces tumor regression in ER+ breast cancer xenograft models. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis phase I dose-escalation multicenter study enrolled postmenopausal women with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics, and recommended phase II dose of GDC-0927. Pharmacodynamics was assessed with [18F]-fluoroestradiol (FES) PET scans.

resultsForty-two patients received GDC-0927 once daily. The MTD was not reached. The most common adverse events (AE) regardless of causality were nausea, constipation, diarrhea, arthralgia, fatigue, hot flush, back pain, and vomiting. There were no deaths, grade 4/5 AEs, or treatment-related serious AEs. Two patients experienced grade 2 AEs of special interest of deep vein thrombosis and jugular vein thrombosis, both considered unrelated to GDC-0927. Following dosing, approximately 1.6-fold accumulation was observed, consistent with the observed half-life and dosing frequency. There were no complete or partial responses. Pharmacodynamics was supported by >90% reduction in FES uptake and an approximately 40% reduction in ER expression, suggesting ER degradation is not the mechanistic driver of ER antagonism. Twelve patients (29%) achieved clinical benefit; 17 patients (41%) showed a confirmed best overall response of stable disease. Baseline levels of ER and progesterone receptor protein and mutant ESR1 circulating tumor DNA did not correlate with clinical benefit.

conclusionsGDC-0927 appeared to be well tolerated with pharmacokinetics supporting once-daily dosing. There was evidence of target engagement and preliminary evidence of antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with advanced/metastatic ER+/HER2- breast cancer with and without ESR1 mutations.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEstrogen Receptor AntagonistsFemaleHumansPositron-Emission TomographyPostmenopauseReceptors, EstrogenEstrogen Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID37261814
PMCPMC10390885
OpenAlexW4378952541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.