Effects of Twin-Block Appliance Therapy on Urinary Leukotriene E4 and Serum C-Reactive Protein Levels in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Children with Class II Malocclusion and Mandibular Retrognathia: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Effects of twin-block appliance on upper airway parameters in OSA children with class II malocclusion and mandibular retrognathia: a CBCT study.European journal of pediatrics · 2023
   Article
2. Effects of twin-block appliance on quality of life in OSA children with class 2 malocclusion and mandibular retrognathia.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as