ArticleIrish journal of medical science2024
Comparison of inpatient outcomes in patients with Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, and Hepatitis B and C co-infection with Cirrhosis.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prediction of Treatment Response in Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C Coinfected Patients Using a Leakage-Proof, Internally Validated Logistic Regression Pipeline.Advances in virology · 2026Article
- Immunological and Virological Responses in Patients with Monoinfection and Coinfection with Hepatitis B and C Viruses in the Brazilian Amazon.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHepatitis B (HBV) and Hepatitis C (HCV) are among the most common causes of cirrhosis in the USA, with high mortality and morbidity but comparative outcomes were not well studied.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed cirrhosis patients with HBV, HCV, and HBV/HCV coinfection from 2016 to 2019 in National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Our primary outcome was the length of stay (LOS), mean hospital charge and mortality.
resultsOur study included 701464 cirrhosis patients with HCV (89.7%), HBV (6.8%), and coinfection (3.5%) (P < 0.001). Male gender and white race were more common in all three cohorts (p < 0.001). The mean age for HBV, HCV, and coinfection was 55.59, 58.69, and 58.27 years. The mean LOS for HBV, HCV, and coinfection were 6.59 ± 0.1, 6.02 ± 0.03, and 6.74 ± 0.12 days respectively. The adjusted length of stay was 0.62 days longer in the HBV cohort and 0.61 days longer in the coinfection cohort, compared to the HCV cohort (P < 0.001). Adjusted hospital charges were $15112 higher in the HBV cohort and $ 6312 higher in the coinfection cohort, compared to the HCV cohort (P < 0.001). Patients with HBV had a higher risk of mortality compared to HCV infection (AOR 1.35, [1.22-1.48], P < 0.001); However, patients with coinfection had no difference in mortality compared to HCV infection.
conclusionCirrhosis with HBV and coinfection is associated with increased duration of hospital stay and cost when compared to HCV infection. There is a higher risk of mortality in cirrhotic patients with HBV infection compared to HCV; however, no significant difference in mortality for coinfection compared to HCV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.