Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37261644›Full record

ArticleAmbio2023

Assessing the role of protected areas in the land-use change dynamics of a biodiversity hotspot.

Marcelo Henrique Schmitz, Edivando Vitor do Couto, Erick Caldas Xavier, Leonardo da Silva Tomadon, Rodrigo Pedro Leal, Angelo Antonio Agostinho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marcelo Henrique SchmitzDepartamento de Biologia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais - PEA, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, 87020-900, Brazil.
Edivando Vitor do CoutoTechnische Universität München, Arcisstraße 21, 80333, Munich, Germany. edivando.couto@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4264-8449
Erick Caldas XavierDepartamento de Biologia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais - PEA, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, 87020-900, Brazil.
Leonardo da Silva TomadonDepartamento de Biologia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais - PEA, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, 87020-900, Brazil.
Rodrigo Pedro LealDepartamento de Biologia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais - PEA, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, 87020-900, Brazil.
Angelo Antonio AgostinhoDepartamento de Biologia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais - PEA, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, 87020-900, Brazil.

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although protected areas (PAs) are designed to safeguard natural ecosystems from anthropic modifications, many PAs worldwide are subjected to numerous human-induced impacts. We evaluated whether the establishment of PAs in the Upper Paraná River floodplain region could reduce anthropic landscape changes and whether there is a difference in protection when using different PA restriction categories. We analyzed the overall landscape dynamics using 30 years of land-use time series data and evaluated the change intensity via a partial land-use intensity analysis. Despite the increasing landscape anthropization, the PAs seemed to relieve the general change process, protecting natural areas mainly from agricultural expansion. Concerning the degree of use restriction, more restricted protection led to less human-induced changes. Finally, accessing PA effectiveness is a multidisciplinary challenge for researchers; however, this knowledge is crucial to avoid misunderstandings or poorly crafted public policies or decisions that may harm the environment.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemAgricultureBiodiversityBrazilHumansConservationEffectivenessGeoprocessingHuman impactsLand-use policyWetlands

Identifiers

PMID37261644
PMCPMC10460765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.