Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37261612›Full record

ArticleInfectious diseases and therapy2023

Rapid Diagnostic Test Value and Implementation in Antimicrobial Stewardship Across Low-to-Middle and High-Income Countries: A Mixed-Methods Review.

Luke S P Moore, Maria Virginia Villegas, Eric Wenzler, Timothy M Rawson, Rita O Oladele, Yohei Doi, Anucha Apisarnthanarak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Luke S P MooreClinical Infection Department, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH, UK. l.moore@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7095-7922
Maria Virginia VillegasGrupo de Resistencia Antimicrobiana y Epidemiología Hospitalaria, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.
Eric WenzlerCollege of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Timothy M RawsonNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections & Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Rita O OladeleDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria.
Yohei DoiDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Anucha ApisarnthanarakResearch Group in Infectious Diseases Epidemiology and Prevention, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Fujita Health University · JPImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre · GBThammasat University · THUniversidad El Bosque · COUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Lagos · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite technological advancements in infectious disease rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and use to direct therapy at the per-patient level, RDT utilisation in antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) is variable across low-to-middle income and high-income countries. Key insights from a panel of seven infectious disease experts from Colombia, Japan, Nigeria, Thailand, the UK, and the USA, combined with evidence from a literature review, were used to assess the value of RDTs in ASPs. From this, a value framework is proposed which aims to define the benefits of RDT use in ASPs, separate from per-patient benefits. Expert insights highlight that, to realise the value of RDTs within ASPs, effective implementation is key; actionable advice for choosing an RDT is proposed. Experts advocate the inclusion of RDTs in the World Health Organization Model List of essential in vitro diagnostics and in iterative development of national action plans.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial resistanceAntimicrobial stewardshipAntimicrobial stewardship programmesHigh-, middle-, and low-income countriesInfectious disease RDTPoint-of-care testingRapid diagnostic tests

Identifiers

PMID37261612
PMCPMC10233178
OpenAlexW4378952454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.