Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37261596›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2023

Evaluation of XGEN Multi Sepsis Flow Chip Molecular Assay for Early Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infection.

Maira M Maluf, Karen Bauab, Bruno C Boettger, Antonio C C Pignatari, Cecília G Carvalhaes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Maira M MalufClinical Laboratory, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, 2Nd Floor, B Section, 627, Avenue Albert Einstein, São Paulo, 05652-900, Brazil. maira.maluf@einstein.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3428-2873
Karen BauabHospital São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Bruno C BoettgerLaboratório Especial de Microbiologia Clínica, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Antonio C C PignatariLaboratório Especial de Microbiologia Clínica, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cecília G CarvalhaesJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, USA.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BRHospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BRHospital São Paulo · BRJMI Laboratories · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among healthcare-associated infections that can affect a critically ill patient, bloodstream infections are one of the most frequent causes of mortality, especially in hospitalized patients. The objective of this work is to evaluate the performance of the XGEN Multi Sepsis Flow Chip for the rapid diagnosis of bloodstream infections compared with conventional tests. In total, 101 positive blood culture samples were included, and the results obtained by the phenotypic conventional method (culture with susceptibility profile) were compared with results obtained by the XGEN Multi Sepsis Flow Chip. This molecular assay allows the simultaneous detection of the main bloodstream infection pathogens, and their most common antibiotic resistance markers in a short period of time. It was possible to observe substantial agreement between the methods for identifying the genus of pathogens. Considering species, the agreement was excellent. In relation to susceptibility, excellent agreement was noted between the detected resistance genes and susceptibility profile obtained through conventional antibiograms. The evaluated assay presented very early and satisfactory results for identification and detection of resistance genes of the main pathogens involved in bloodstream infections.

Indexed as

BacteremiaCross InfectionSepsisAnti-Bacterial AgentsEarly DiagnosisHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID37261596
OpenAlexW4378952227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.