ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2023
Chromosomal abnormalities in recurrent pregnancy loss and its association with clinical characteristics.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy on pregnancy outcomes of patients with recurrent miscarriage: a retrospective study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Article
- Cumulative live birth following preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus conventional IVF/ICSI in unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss: a retrospective cohort study with intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Genomics of pregnancy loss.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Review
- Research Hotspots and Emerging Frontiers in Ovarian Aging: A Bibliometric Analysis (2006-2025).Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2026Review
- Noninvasive prenatal tests for chromosomal abnormality screening in in vitro fertilisation elderly pregnant women in northwest China.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2025Article
- Exploring the epigenetic mechanisms of recurrent pregnancy loss: from genetic predisposition to environmental influences.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Review
- The relationship between fetal tissue chromosomal karyotype and clinical characteristics in patients with spontaneous abortion: a retrospective study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Analysis of Risk Factors and Prediction Model of Chromosomal Abnormalities in Embryos from Patients with Missed Miscarriage.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Article
- Risk factors associated with pregnancy outcomes in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss after treatment.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Ralationship between polymorphisms and diplotypes of HLA-G 3'UTR and fetuses with abnormal chromosomes or unexplained pregnancy loss (UPL).Human genomics · 2024Article
- High-risk factors for massive haemorrhage in medical abortion patients with missed miscarriage.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- PGT-A: Houston, we have a problem.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the distribution of chromosomal abnormalities in a recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) cohort and explore the associations between chromosomal abnormalities and clinical characteristics.
methodOver a 5-year period, fresh products of conception (POC) from women with RPL were analyzed by single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array at our hospital. After obtaining the information on clinical characteristics, we investigated the associations between the causative chromosomal abnormalities and clinical characteristics by the chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test and logistic regression.
resultsA total of 2383 cases were enrolled. Overall, 56.9% (1355/2383) were identified with causative chromosomal abnormalities, of which 92.1% (1248/1355) were numerical abnormalities, 7.5% (102/1355) were structural variants, and 0.4% (5/1355) were loss of heterozygosity (LOH). The risk of numerical abnormalities was increased in women with maternal age ≥ 35 years (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.41-2.07), gestational age at pregnancy loss ≤ 12 weeks (OR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.79-4.33), less number of previous pregnancy losses (twice: OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.84-2.94; 3 times: OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.23-2.05, respectively), and pregnancy with a female fetus (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.15-1.62). The OR of pregnancy loss with recurrent abnormal CMA was 4.00 (95% CI: 1.87-8.58, P < 0.001) and the adjusted OR was 5.05 (95% CI: 2.00-12.72, P = 0.001). However, the mode of conception was not associated with the incidence of numerical abnormality. No association was noted between structural variants and clinical characteristics.
conclusionChromosomal abnormality was the leading cause of RPL. Numerical chromosome abnormality was more likely to occur in cases with advanced maternal age, an earlier gestational age, fewer previous pregnancy losses, and pregnancy with a female fetus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.