Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37261546›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2023

Posterior stability of the shoulder depends on acromial anatomy: a biomechanical study of 3D surface models.

Bettina Hochreiter, Silvan Beeler, Simon Hofstede, Bastian Sigrist, Jess G Snedeker, Christian Gerber

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bettina HochreiterDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland. bettina.hochreiter@balgrist.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5486-7705
Silvan BeelerDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Simon HofstedeDepartment of Orthopaedics, Biomechanical Research Laboratory, University of Zurich, Balgrist Campus, Zurich, Switzerland.
Bastian SigristResearch in Orthopaedic Computer Science (ROCS), University of Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jess G SnedekerDepartment of Orthopaedics, Biomechanical Research Laboratory, University of Zurich, Balgrist Campus, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christian GerberDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrimary glenohumeral osteoarthritis is commonly associated with static posterior subluxation of the humeral head. Scapulae with static/dynamic posterior instability feature a superiorly and horizontally oriented acromion. We investigated whether the acromion acts as a restraint to posterior humeral translation.

methodsFive three-dimensional (3D) printed scapula models were biomechanically tested. A statistical shape mean model (SSMM) of the normal scapula of 40 asymptomatic shoulders was fabricated. Next, a SSMM of scapular anatomy associated with posterior subluxation was generated using data of 20 scapulae ("B1"). This model was then used to generate three models of surgical correction: glenoid version, acromial orientation, and acromial and glenoid orientation. With the joint axially loaded (100N) and the humerus stabilized, an anterior translation force was applied to the scapula in 35°, 60° and 75° of glenohumeral flexion. Translation (mm) was measured.

resultsIn the normal scapula, the humerus translates significantly less to contact with the acromion compared to all other configurations (p < .000 for all comparisons; i.e. 35°: "normal" 8,1 mm (± 0,0) versus "B1" 11,9 mm (± 0,0) versus "B1 Acromion Correction" 12,2 mm (± 0,2) versus "B1 Glenoid Correction" 13,3 mm (± 0,1)). Restoration of normal translation was only achieved with correction of glenoid and acromial anatomy (i.e. 75°: "normal" 11 mm (± 0,8) versus "B1 Acromion Correction" 17,5 mm (± 0,1) versus "B1 Glenoid Correction" 19,7 mm (± 1,3) versus "B1 Glenoid + Acromion Correction" 11,5 mm (± 1,1)).

conclusionsPersistence or recurrence of static/dynamic posterior instability after correction of glenoid version alone may be related to incomplete restoration of the intrinsic stability that is conferred by a normal acromial anatomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: biomechanical study.

Indexed as

AcromionAnatomyHumeral head subluxationPosterior shoulder instabilityShoulderStatic posteriorWalch B1

Identifiers

PMID37261546
PMCPMC10235013
OpenAlexW4378952819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.