ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023
The clinical significance for primary tumor surgery in metastatic head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Case Report: Long-term disease control with immunotherapy in primary mandibular adenoid cystic carcinoma presenting with pulmonary metastasis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Comparison of postoperative radiotherapy and definitive radiotherapy for non-metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck, a propensity score matching based on the SEER database.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to determine the prognostic significance and optimal candidates for primary tumor surgery (PTS) among patients with metastatic head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma (HNACC).
methodsThe data were retrieved from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients with metastatic HNACC at the initial diagnosis were included in this study. Univariate survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference in survival curves between PTS and non-PTS groups was estimated using the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the independent prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).
resultsOverall, 155 patients were eligible, of whom 93 underwent palliative PTS. Patients with lung metastasis alone were more likely to undergo PTS. PTS was associated with significantly improved OS and CSS compared with non-PTS. In the multivariate model, patients who underwent PTS had better OS than those who did not undergo PTS; however, no improvement was observed in the CSS. Subgroup analyses further revealed that patients aged < 60 years with T3-4 or N0 classification might benefit from PTS.
conclusionPTS significantly improved the OS of patients with metastatic HNACC. PTS had a favorable prognostic impact on highly selected patients, namely, those aged < 60 years with T3-4 and N0 classification, which could be adopted in future clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.