Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37261465›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2023

A rapid single-phase extraction for polar staphylococcal lipids.

Kingsley Bimpeh, Kelly M Hines

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. mBio · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Lipidomics of homeoviscous adaptation to low temperatures inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kingsley BimpehDepartment of Chemistry, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2313-8374
Kelly M HinesDepartment of Chemistry, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA. kelly.hines@uga.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9125-5268
University of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lipid membrane is gaining appreciation as a critical factor in the emergence of antibiotic resistance, both for antibiotics that target lipid synthesis or the membrane directly and for cell-wall-targeting antibiotics. The methods used to study the emergence of antibiotic resistance in vitro can generate a large number of samples that may be low in volume and in cell density. As in eukaryotic/mammalian lipidomics, two-phase liquid-liquid extractions are the most commonly used approach to recover lipids from bacteria. The need to separate the lipid layer is cumbersome for high-throughput applications and can be a source of poor reproducibility or contaminant introduction. While several single-phase extractions have been proposed for serum, tissue, and eukaryotic cells, there have been far fewer efforts to adapt or develop such methods for bacteria lipidomics. Here, we describe a simple, single-phase lipid extraction method based on methanol, acetonitrile, and water-the MAW method. The merits of the MAW method are evaluated against the Bligh & Dyer (B&D) method for the recovery of the major membrane lipids (phosphatidylglycerols, diglycosyldiacylglycerols, and lysyl-phosphatidylglycerols) in the Gram-positive pathogen Staphylococcus aureus. We demonstrate that the MAW method achieves recoveries that are comparable to that of the B&D extraction (≥ 85% for PG 15:0/d

Indexed as

MethanolWaterAnimalsLiquid-Liquid ExtractionMammalsMembrane LipidsReproducibility of ResultsMembrane LipidsMethanolWaterBacteriaExtractionHigh-throughputLipidsSingle-phaseStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID37261465
OpenAlexW4378952189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.