Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37261426›Full record

ArticleeLife2023

Flexible control of representational dynamics in a disinhibition-based model of decision-making.

Bo Shen, Kenway Louie, Paul Glimcher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bo ShenNeuroscience Institute, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5796-0844
Kenway LouieNeuroscience Institute, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9665-5436
Paul GlimcherNeuroscience Institute, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7872-3856
New York University · US

Funding

Computational neuroeconomic models of addiction: quantifying progression and treatment in opioid use disorderR01DA043676 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI GLIMCHER, PAUL W, ROTROSEN, JOHN P · 2017 to 2021
$2.1M
Neural Mechanisms of Cost and Benefit Integration During Decision-MakingR01DA038063 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI GLIMCHER, PAUL W · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA038063NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA043676NIH HHS R01DA038063NIH HHS R01DA043676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhibition is crucial for brain function, regulating network activity by balancing excitation and implementing gain control. Recent evidence suggests that beyond simply inhibiting excitatory activity, inhibitory neurons can also shape circuit function through disinhibition. While disinhibitory circuit motifs have been implicated in cognitive processes, including learning, attentional selection, and input gating, the role of disinhibition is largely unexplored in the study of decision-making. Here, we show that disinhibition provides a simple circuit motif for fast, dynamic control of network state and function. This dynamic control allows a disinhibition-based decision model to reproduce both value normalization and winner-take-all dynamics, the two central features of neurobiological decision-making captured in separate existing models with distinct circuit motifs. In addition, the disinhibition model exhibits flexible attractor dynamics consistent with different forms of persistent activity seen in working memory. Fitting the model to empirical data shows it captures well both the neurophysiological dynamics of value coding and psychometric choice behavior. Furthermore, the biological basis of disinhibition provides a simple mechanism for flexible top-down control of the network states, enabling the circuit to capture diverse task-dependent neural dynamics. These results suggest a biologically plausible unifying mechanism for decision-making and emphasize the importance of local disinhibition in neural processing.

Indexed as

LearningMemory, Short-TermChoice BehaviorModels, NeurologicalNeuronsReaction Timecomputational biologydecision-making circuitdisinhibitiondivisive normalizationneurosciencepersistent activityrhesus macaquesystems biologywinner-take-all choice

Identifiers

PMID37261426
PMCPMC10313320
OpenAlexW4378953299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.