ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2023
Metagenome Investigation of Ocular Microbiota of Cataract Patients With and Without Type 2 Diabetes.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distinct Host and Bacterial Profiles in Murine Single Versus Co-Infection with Foal-IsolatedMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Article
- Acute and long-term effects of ocular surface burns on ocular surface microbiota: a one-year follow-up study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Pre-Colonization of Bacillus siamensis on Ocular Surface Mitigates Fusarium keratitis Through Direct Antifungal Activity and Pre-Activation of NF-κB Pathway.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Alterations of ocular surface microbiome in glaucoma and its association with dry eye.Journal of medical microbiology · 2025Article
- Association between triglyceride-glucose index and cataract among outpatient US adults.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Sequencing the ocular surface microbiome: a review of methodological practices and considerations.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Infectious Keratitis: Characterization of Microbial Diversity through Species Richness and Shannon Diversity Index.Biomolecules · 2024Article
- Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography: A 2023 Focused Update on Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Review
- Insight into the mechanism of gallstone disease by proteomic and metaproteomic characterization of human bile.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Our objective was to investigate differences in the ocular surface bacterial composition in cataract patients with and without type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: Twenty-four diabetic patients with cataracts (group D) and 14 sex- and age-matched patients with age-related cataracts (group N) were recruited for this study. All samples underwent DNA extraction, fragmentation, purification, library construction, and metagenomic sequencing. Results: The overall conjunctival sac bacterial composition was similar between group D and group N, as determined by alpha diversity and beta diversity. Nevertheless, significant differences were observed in the relative abundance of specific bacteria. At the phylum level, group D had a significantly lower abundance of Chlamydiae, Tenericutes, Chloroflexi, Cyanobacteria, Cossaviricota, Chytridiomycota, Artverviricota, Zoopagomycota, Peploviricota, Deinococcus-Thermus, Preplasmiviricota, and Nucleocytoviricota. At the genus level, group D had a significantly lower abundance of Chlamydia, Mycoplasma, Salmonella, Chryseobacterium, Roseovarius, Desulfococcus, Kangiella, Anaerococcus, and Idiomarina but a significantly higher abundance of Parabacteroides, Phocaeicola, and Sphingomonas. Bacteria such as Aquificae, Parabacteroides, Flavobacterium, Austwickia, Aquifex, Tenacibaculum, and Chryseobacterium in group D and Tenericutes, Chlamydiae, Porphyromonas, Mycoplasma, Chlamydia, Kangiella, Idiomarina, Roseovarius, Aliiroseovarius, and Desulfococcus in group N could be used as conjunctival sac biomarkers, according to the linear discriminant analysis effect size. Gene Ontology functional annotation indicated that bacterial catalytic activity, metabolic processes, locomotion, virion, and reproduction were enriched in group D, while immune system processes were enriched in group N. In addition, the top 30 differentially expressed virulence factors (VFs) were all more enriched in group D. Conclusions: The bacterial composition was similar between the two groups. Several bacterial strains that were reported beneficial in gut were decreased, and pathogenic bacteria were increased in T2D. Furthermore, group D had more active bacterial terms and increased VF expression, suggesting that the susceptibility of diabetic patients to infection is closely related to functional changes in the ocular surface flora. Our conjunctival microbiota atlas provides a reference for investigating ocular complications related to diabetes. Translational Relevance: The altered composition and functional profile of the ocular microbial community in diabetic patients offer evidence for the need to prevent infection during cataract surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.