ArticleAcute medicine & surgery
Mapping publications using the Japan Trauma Data Bank: Scoping review of the international literature.
Article in Acute medicine & surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Severe trauma care: advances and future directions in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques and information technology support.Medical review (2021) · 2026Article
- Factors Associated with Prolonged Prehospital On-Site Time in Adult Trauma Patients: A Nationwide Observational Study in Japan.JMA journal · 2026Article
- Mapping publications using the Japan Trauma Data Bank: Scoping review of the international literature.Acute medicine & surgeryArticle
- Profile and Data Quality of DataVerse Japan: A Multi-Institutional Clinical Data Platform for Emergency and Critical Care Research.Acute medicine & surgeryArticle
- Isolated Scalp Laceration in the Elderly: Association Between Age and Red Blood Cell Transfusion Despite Anatomically Minor Injury.Acute medicine & surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to describe the characteristics of published international literature using the Japan Trauma Data Bank (JTDB). We undertook a scoping review of studies using data from JTDB. We carried out a systematic search of the following databases on November 21, 2022, using search terms that covers trauma registries in Japan: MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. Two authors independently abstracted the data. We included all original articles written in English. We identified 166 studies from the 456 included articles. From 2010 to 2016, the annual number of published articles was less than 10. In 2017, there were 10 articles published (6.0%). This increased to 18 (10.8%) in 2018, 21 (12.7%) in 2019, 28 (16.9%) in 2020, 33 (19.9%) in 2021, and 37 (22.3%) in 2022. Most articles (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.