Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37261078›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2023

Alka Srivastava, Anoop K Shukla, Subhi Srivastava, Rama S Dubey, Pradyumna K Singh, Praveen C Verma

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alka SrivastavaPlant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Division, CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
Anoop K ShuklaPlant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Division, CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
Subhi SrivastavaPlant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Division, CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
Rama S DubeyDepartment of Biochemistry, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Pradyumna K SinghPlant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Division, CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
Praveen C VermaPlant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Division, CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cotton is a significant industrial crop, playing an essential role in the global economy that suffers several setbacks due to biotic and abiotic adversities. Despite such problems, biotechnological advances in cotton are limited because of genetic transformation and regeneration limitations. Here, we present a detailed protocol optimized based on previously published papers, along with our modifications. These involve changes in

Indexed as

AgrobacteriumCallus inductionCottonSomatic embryogenesisStable genetic transformationTransgenic cotton

Identifiers

PMID37261078
PMCPMC10227751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.