Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37261017›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2023

Goal-Oriented and Habit-Oriented Reflective Models to Support Professional Identity Formation and Metacognitive Thinking.

Machelle Linsenmeyer, Goldberry Long

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Machelle LinsenmeyerOffice of Assessment and Educational Development, West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lewisburg, WV 24901 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5796-8843
Goldberry LongDepartment of Creative Writing, University of California Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, CA 92521 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Professional identity formation (PIF) is a multi-year, complex, social, and intellectual process that culminates in trainees "thinking, acting, and feeling like a doctor." Some of the processes of PIF, particularly the Hidden Curriculum, may result in suboptimal outcomes in student's cognition, including implicit bias and poor clinical decision-making. Many have recognized the importance of reflective writing, particularly metacognition, in undergraduate medical education. However, there are few concrete examples and explanations for fully integrating reflective writing exercises across multiple situations, experiences, and levels of growth. The authors provide conceptual frameworks, concrete curricular structures, and reflective tools used at two medical schools. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-023-01752-9.

Indexed as

CoachingMetacognitionPortfoliosProfessional identify formationReflection

Identifiers

PMID37261017
PMCPMC10226929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.