Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37261004›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2023

Rationale for the evaluation of renal functional reserve in allogeneic stem cell transplantation candidates: a pilot study.

Nicoletta Mancianti, Andrea Guarnieri, Mariapia Lenoci, Francesca Toraldo, Domenica Paola Salvo, Massimo Belluardo, Ernesto Iadanza, Fabio Ferretti, Giuseppe Marotta, Guido Garosi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Renal Functional Reserve and Its Association with eGFR Trajectories and Blood Pressure Patterns in Hypertensives with Preserved Renal Function.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicoletta ManciantiDipartimento di Emergenza-Urgenza e dei Trapianti, UOC Nefrologia, Dialisi e Trapianti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7009-2367
Andrea GuarnieriDipartimento di Emergenza-Urgenza e dei Trapianti, UOC Nefrologia, Dialisi e Trapianti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy.
Mariapia LenociDipartimento Innovazione, Sperimentazione e Ricerca Clinica e Traslazionale, UOC Terapie Cellulari e Officina Trasfusionale, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy.
Francesca ToraldoDipartimento Innovazione, Sperimentazione e Ricerca Clinica e Traslazionale, UOC Terapie Cellulari e Officina Trasfusionale, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy.
Domenica Paola SalvoDipartimento di Emergenza-Urgenza e dei Trapianti, UOC Nefrologia, Dialisi e Trapianti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy.
Massimo BelluardoDipartimento di Emergenza-Urgenza e dei Trapianti, UOC Nefrologia, Dialisi e Trapianti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy.
Ernesto IadanzaDipartimento di Biotecnologie Mediche, Università di Siena, Siena, Italy.
Fabio FerrettiDipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Chirurgiche e Neuroscienze, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy.
Giuseppe MarottaDipartimento Innovazione, Sperimentazione e Ricerca Clinica e Traslazionale, UOC Terapie Cellulari e Officina Trasfusionale, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy.
Guido GarosiDipartimento di Emergenza-Urgenza e dei Trapianti, UOC Nefrologia, Dialisi e Trapianti, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese · ITUniversity of Siena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The main purpose of our study was to evaluate the ability of renal functional reserve (RFR) to stratify the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) occurrence within 100 days of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and to predict any functional recovery or the onset of chronic kidney disease. A secondary aim was to identify the clinical/laboratory risk factors for the occurrence of AKI. Methods: The study design is prospective observational. We enrolled 48 patients with normal basal glomerular filtration rate (bGFR) who underwent allogenic HSCT. A multiparameter assessment and the Renal Functional Reserve Test (RFR-T) using an oral protein load stress test were performed 15 days before the HSCT. Results: Different RFRs corresponded to the same bGFR values. Of 48 patients, 29 (60%) developed AKI. Comparing the AKI group with the group that did not develop AKI, no statistically significant difference emerged in any characteristic related to demographic, clinical or multiparameter assessment variables except for the estimated GFR (eGFR). eGFR ≤100 mL/min/1.73 m Conclusion: RFR identifies subclinical functional deterioration conditions essential for post-AKI recovery. In our cohort of patients with no kidney disease (NKD), the degree of pre-HSCT eGFR is associated with AKI risk, and a reduction in pre-HSCT RFR above a threshold of 20% is related to complete renal functional recovery post-AKI. Identifying eGFR first and RFR second could help select patients who might benefit from changes in transplant management or early nephrological assessment.

Indexed as

acute kidney injurychronic kidney diseasehematopoietic stem cell transplantationrenal functional reserve

Identifiers

PMID37261004
PMCPMC10229270
OpenAlexW4311029797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.