ArticleMedical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)2023
A Treatment Approach in Congenital Fibrosis of Extraocular Muscles.
Article in Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Congenital fibrosis of extraocular muscles ( CFEOM) is a group of genetically defined eye-moving disorders. The syndrome is clinically characterized by congenital non-progressive ophthalmoplegia caused by dysinervation of the cranial nerves with or without ptosis. As a main sign of a CFEOM, extraocular muscles get shrunken and fibrotic, which makes surgery more technically demanding and the result more unpredictable, which makes the treatment challenging and highly customized. Our paper presents variations of the clinical picture and treatment cases of CFEOM1. Objective: To outline the importance of the clinical examination with the exact measurement of deviations for the patients with ocular fibrosis and passive duction test under general anesthesia, establishing them as the main criteria for treatment. Methods: We treated seven patients (14 eyes) with CFEOM1. The decision of the treatment was based on the measurement of the eye position in the primary position (PP), the severity of compensatory head position (CHP), restriction of motility, and passive motility test performed before surgery in general anesthesia. In 3 cases, patients were treated conservatively with the treatment of refractive error and amblyopia. However, in 4 patients, CHP and position of the eyes in PP were not acceptable, motility was severely impaired, and patients underwent surgery. The first surgery was performed on eye muscles: recession of inferior rectus muscle (IRM), anteposition, and resection of superior rectus muscle (SRM). As a second step procedure, ptosis surgery was performed. When the muscle was too tight, and it wasn't possible to have a satisfying result with conventional surgery, we used a tissue expander to improve the position and motility of the affected eyes. Results: In all operated cases, CHP has significantly improved and the position of the eyes in PP. Conclusion: Exact eye and head position measurements and a passive motility test during general anesthesia should guide the surgery. In the case when conventional surgery is not possible, implantation of a bovine pericard is a safe and effective method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.