Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37260715›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2023

Pseudo-multicomponent reactions.

Julio C Flores-Reyes, Vanesa Del C Cotlame-Salinas, Ilich A Ibarra, Eduardo González-Zamora, Alejandro Islas-Jácome

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Synthesis of Imidazolidin-2-ones fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. NiFeRSC advances · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julio C Flores-ReyesDepartamento de Química, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa Av. Ferrocarril San Rafael Atlixco 186, Col. Leyes de Reforma 1A Sección, Iztapalapa Ciudad de México C.P. 09310 Mexico egz@xanum.uam.mx aij@xanum.uam.mx.
Vanesa Del C Cotlame-SalinasDepartamento de Química, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa Av. Ferrocarril San Rafael Atlixco 186, Col. Leyes de Reforma 1A Sección, Iztapalapa Ciudad de México C.P. 09310 Mexico egz@xanum.uam.mx aij@xanum.uam.mx.
Ilich A IbarraLaboratorio de Fisicoquímica y Reactividad de Superficies, (LaFReS), Instituto de Investigaciones en Materiales, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Circuito Exterior S/N, CU, Coyoacán Ciudad de México Mexico argel@unam.mx.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8573-8033
Eduardo González-ZamoraDepartamento de Química, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa Av. Ferrocarril San Rafael Atlixco 186, Col. Leyes de Reforma 1A Sección, Iztapalapa Ciudad de México C.P. 09310 Mexico egz@xanum.uam.mx aij@xanum.uam.mx.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3995-9126
Alejandro Islas-JácomeDepartamento de Química, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa Av. Ferrocarril San Rafael Atlixco 186, Col. Leyes de Reforma 1A Sección, Iztapalapa Ciudad de México C.P. 09310 Mexico egz@xanum.uam.mx aij@xanum.uam.mx.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0975-5904

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classical multicomponent reactions (MCRs) are domino-type one-pot processes in which three or more different reactants are combined sequentially in the same reactor to synthesize compounds containing all or almost all atoms coming from the reactants. Besides, pseudo-MCRs are also domino-type one-pot processes involving combinations of at least three reactants but in which at least one of them takes part in two or more reaction steps. In consequence, the products synthesized through pseudo-MCRs contain also all or almost all atoms but coming from two or more identical reactants. Thus, pseudo-MCRs differ from classical MCRs because the first ones appear to involve an assembly of a higher number of different components than those that are being truly assembled. However, pseudo-MCRs are also useful synthetic tools to generate libraries of complex compounds in few experimental steps, and although the repeated reactants may make them appear less diverse than classical MCRs, this can be offset by the higher number of reactants that can participate in this type of reaction. Overall, there are two types of pseudo-MCRs. The first are those in which the duplicated reagents participate in different steps of the corresponding reaction mechanism. The second kind of pseudo-MCRs are those in which one or more components react simultaneously with a main reagent containing two or more identical functional groups. These latter are known as repetitive pseudo-MCRs. Thus, the aim of the present review is to cover for the first time selected works mainly published in the last two decades about pseudo-MCRs and their repetitive versions toward the synthesis of novel, complex, and highly symmetrical molecules, often including their interesting applications in various fields of science and technology. The manuscript has been categorized considering the number of reagents participating in the corresponding pseudo-MCRs, aiming to give readers novel insights for their future investigations.

Identifiers

PMID37260715
PMCPMC10228497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.