ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2023
RFcaller: a machine learning approach combined with read-level features to detect somatic mutations.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic architecture of IRF4 rearrangements in childhood and adult large B-cell lymphomas.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Article
- Predicting high confidence ctDNA somatic variants with ensemble machine learning models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Large B-cell lymphomas with CCND1 rearrangement have different immunoglobulin gene breakpoints and genomic profile than mantle cell lymphoma.Blood cancer journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cost reduction in sequencing and the extensive genomic characterization of a wide variety of cancers are expanding tumor sequencing to a wide number of research groups and the clinical practice. Although specific pipelines have been generated for the identification of somatic mutations, their results usually differ considerably, and a common approach is to use several callers to achieve a more reliable set of mutations. This procedure is computationally expensive and time-consuming, and it suffers from the same limitations in sensitivity and specificity as other approaches. Expert revision of mutant calls is therefore required to verify calls that might be used for clinical diagnosis. This step could take advantage of machine learning techniques, as they provide a useful approach to incorporate expert-reviewed information for the identification of somatic mutations. Here we present RFcaller, a pipeline based on machine learning algorithms, for the detection of somatic mutations in tumor-normal paired samples that does not require large computing resources. RFcaller shows high accuracy for the detection of substitutions and insertions/deletions from whole genome or exome data. It allows the detection of mutations in driver genes missed by other approaches, and has been validated by comparison to deep and Sanger sequencing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.