ArticleERJ open research2023
Residual risk identified in routine noninvasive follow-up assessments in pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Article in ERJ open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence-derived risk stratification versus conventional risk stratification methods in pulmonary hypertension patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Pooled it
- Risk stratification and multidisciplinary management strategies for pregnancy complicated by pulmonary arterial hypertension: a narrative review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Right ventricular strain to systolic pulmonary artery pressure ratio in response to treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.ERJ open research · 2024Article
- Management of pulmonary arterial hypertension:before, during and after pregnancy.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines on pulmonary hypertension recommend noninvasive risk assessments based on three clinical variables during follow-up in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). We set out to test whether residual risk can be captured from routinely measured noninvasive clinical variables during follow-up in PAH. Methods: We retrospectively studied 298 incident PAH patients from a German pulmonary hypertension centre who underwent routine noninvasive follow-up assessments including exercise testing, echocardiography, electrocardiography, pulmonary function testing and biochemistry. To select variables, we used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-regularised Cox regression models. Outcome was defined as mortality or lung transplant after first follow-up assessment. Results: 12 noninvasive variables that were associated with outcomes in a training sub-cohort (n=208) after correction for multiple testing entered LASSO modelling. A model combining seven variables discriminated 1-year (area under the curve (AUC) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-0.99, p=8.4×10 Conclusion: Our real-world data suggest that residual risk can be captured by noninvasive clinical procedures during routine follow-up assessments in patients with PAH and highlights the potential use of echocardiographic imaging to refine risk assessment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.