ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2023
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibition as a Target for Antibiotic Synergy in Enterococci.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structure-Activity Relationship Studies for 1,3,4-Thiadiazole-Based Bacterial Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors withJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Bacterial Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitor CAI0019 Demonstrates Efficacy inACS infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Hyaluronic Acid-Palmitate Nanoparticle Delivery of Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors Impairs Growth and Early Metabolism inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Computational and Experimental Characterization ofBioinformatics and biology insights · 2026Article
- Review
- Acetazolamide-Loaded Nanoparticle Based on Modified Hyaluronic Acid as Delivery System to Target Carbonic Anhydrases inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Enterococcus faecalis is a hospital-associated opportunistic pathogen that can cause infections with high mortality, such as infective endocarditis. With an increasing occurrence of multidrug-resistant enterococci, there is a need for alternative strategies to treat enterococcal infections. We isolated a gentamicin-hypersusceptible E. faecalis strain from a patient with infective endocarditis that carried a mutation in the alpha-carbonic anhydrase (α-CA) and investigated how disruption of α-CA sensitized E. faecalis to killing with gentamicin. The gentamicin-hypersusceptible α-CA mutant strain showed increased intracellular gentamicin uptake in comparison to an isogenic strain encoding full-length, wild-type α-CA. We hypothesized that increased gentamicin uptake could be due to increased proton motive force (PMF), increased membrane permeability, or both. We observed increased intracellular ATP production in the α-CA mutant strain, suggesting increased PMF-driven gentamicin uptake contributed to the strain's gentamicin susceptibility. We also analyzed the membrane permeability and fatty acid composition of isogenic wild-type and α-CA mutant strains and found that the mutant displayed a membrane composition that was consistent with increased membrane permeability. Finally, we observed that exposure to the FDA-approved α-CA inhibitor acetazolamide lowered the gentamicin MIC of eight genetically diverse E. faecalis strains with intact α-CA but did not change the MIC of the α-CA mutant strain. These results suggest that α-CA mutation or inhibition increases PMF and alters membrane permeability, leading to increased uptake of gentamicin into E. faecalis. This connection could be exploited clinically to provide new combination therapies for patients with enterococcal infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.