Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37260299›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2023

Effectiveness of fosfomycin trometamol as oral step-down therapy for bacteraemic urinary tract infections due to MDR Escherichia coli: a post hoc analysis of the FOREST randomized trial.

Jesús Sojo-Dorado, Inmaculada López-Hernández, Alicia Hernández-Torres, Pilar Retamar-Gentil, Esperanza Merino de Lucas, Laura Escolà-Vergé, Elena Bereciartua, Elisa García-Vázquez, Vicente Pintado, Lucía Boix-Palop and 17 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. In Vitro Antibacterial Activities of Fosfomycin againstAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Jesús Sojo-DoradoDepartamentos de Medicina y Microbiología, Unidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena; Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS)/CSIC; Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
Inmaculada López-HernándezDepartamentos de Medicina y Microbiología, Unidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena; Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS)/CSIC; Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
Alicia Hernández-TorresServicio de Medicina Interna, Unidad de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.
Pilar Retamar-GentilDepartamentos de Medicina y Microbiología, Unidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena; Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS)/CSIC; Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
Esperanza Merino de LucasUnidad de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital General Universitario Dr Balmis, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain.
Laura Escolà-VergéCIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Elena BereciartuaUnidad de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Instituto de Investigación Biocruces, Baracaldo, Vizcaya, Spain.
Elisa García-VázquezServicio de Medicina Interna, Unidad de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.
Vicente PintadoCIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Lucía Boix-PalopServicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.
Clara Natera-KindelánCIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Luisa SorlíServicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital del Mar, and Grupo de Investigación en Patología Infecciosa y Antibioterapia, Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Nuria BorrellServicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Concha Amador-ProusUnidad de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Marina Baixa, Villajoyosa, Alicante, Spain.
Evelyn ShawCIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Alfredo Jover-SaenzUnidad Territorial Infección Nosocomial, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida, Lleida, Spain.
Jose MolinaCIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Rosa M Martínez-ÁlvarezUnidad de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Royo Villanova, Zaragoza, Spain.
Carlos J DueñasUnidad de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain.
Jorge Calvo-MontesCIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
María LecuonaServicio de Microbiología y Control de la Infección, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, La Laguna, Spain.
Virginia PomarUnidad de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Irene BorregueroUnidad de Investigación Clínica y apoyo a Ensayos Clínicos (CTU), Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío y Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain.
Virginia Palomo-JiménezDepartamentos de Medicina y Microbiología, Unidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena; Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS)/CSIC; Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
Fernando Docobo-PérezDepartamentos de Medicina y Microbiología, Unidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena; Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS)/CSIC; Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
Álvaro PascualDepartamentos de Medicina y Microbiología, Unidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena; Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS)/CSIC; Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8672-5891
Jesús Rodríguez-BañoDepartamentos de Medicina y Microbiología, Unidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena; Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS)/CSIC; Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6732-9001
Instituto de Salud Carlos III · ESHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ESHospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca · ESBioCruces Health research Institute · ESHospital de Sant Pau · ESHospital Marina Baixa · ESHospital Royo Villanova · ESHospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova · ESHospital Universitario de Burgos · ESHospital Universitario de Canarias · ESHospital Universitario Son Espases · ESMútua Terrassa · ESUniversitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ESUniversitat Pompeu Fabra · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFosfomycin is a potentially attractive option as step-down therapy for bacteraemic urinary tract infections (BUTI), but available data are scarce. Our objective was to compare the effectiveness and safety of fosfomycin trometamol and other oral drugs as step-down therapy in patients with BUTI due to MDR Escherichia coli (MDR-Ec).

methodsParticipants in the FOREST trial (comparing IV fosfomycin with ceftriaxone or meropenem for BUTI caused by MDR-Ec in 22 Spanish hospitals from June 2014 to December 2018) who were stepped-down to oral fosfomycin (3 g q48h) or other drugs were included. The primary endpoint was clinical and microbiological cure (CMC) 5-7 days after finalization of treatment. A multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression to estimate the association of oral step-down with fosfomycin with CMC adjusted for confounders.

resultsOverall, 61 patients switched to oral fosfomycin trometamol and 47 to other drugs (cefuroxime axetil, 28; amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, 7 each; ciprofloxacin, 5) were included. CMC was reached by 48/61 patients (78.7%) treated with fosfomycin trometamol and 38/47 (80.9%) with other drugs (difference, -2.2; 95% CI: -17.5 to 13.1; P = 0.38). Subgroup analyses provided similar results. Relapses occurred in 9/61 (15.0%) and 2/47 (4.3%) of patients, respectively (P = 0.03). The adjusted OR for CMC was 1.11 (95% CI: 0.42-3.29, P = 0.75). No relevant differences in adverse events were seen.

conclusionsFosfomycin trometamol might be a reasonable option as step-down therapy in patients with BUTI due to MDR-Ec but the higher rate of relapses would need further assessment.

Indexed as

Escherichia coli InfectionsFosfomycinUrinary Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsEscherichia coliHumansRecurrenceTromethamineAnti-Bacterial AgentsFosfomycinTromethamine

Identifiers

PMID37260299
PMCPMC10775153
OpenAlexW4378953036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.