Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37260194›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2023

On the uncertainty in estimates of the carbon balance recovery time after forest clear-cutting.

Matthias Peichl, Eduardo Martínez-García, Johan E S Fransson, Jörgen Wallerman, Hjalmar Laudon, Tomas Lundmark, Mats B Nilsson

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthias PeichlDepartment of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9940-5846
Eduardo Martínez-GarcíaDepartment of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2176-9671
Johan E S FranssonDepartment of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, Sweden.
Jörgen WallermanDepartment of Forestry and Wood Technology, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.
Hjalmar LaudonDepartment of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, Sweden.
Tomas LundmarkDepartment of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, Sweden.
Mats B NilssonDepartment of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3765-6399

Funding

Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas 2020-01446Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas 942-2015-49
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An essential metric for describing carbon dynamics in managed forest landscapes is the recovery time of the carbon balance after clear-cutting. Here, we demonstrate how the age-dependent mathematical trajectory is affected by both the selected model and data availability, leading to considerable uncertainty in the modelling of the net ecosystem production (NEP) over stand age. We further show that the initial carbon loss estimates associated with the timing of the source-sink transition (SST) are significant, but may have a limited effect on the total carbon sequestration at the end of the standard (RP, 120 years) or optimal (OCS) rotation periods.

Indexed as

EcosystemTreesCarbonCarbon SequestrationForestsUncertaintyCarbonboreal forestcarbon sequestrationclimate change mitigationrotation-forestrysource-sink trajectory

Identifiers

PMID37260194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.