ArticleTurkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology2023
Reproductive and oncologic outcomes in women with non-epithelial ovarian cancer: Single center experience over 25 years.
Article in Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- NEK6 functions as an oncogene to promote the proliferation and metastasis of ovarian cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2025Article
- Spontaneous pregnancy after fertility-sparing surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced pure dysgerminoma: A case report.Clinical case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to present our single-center clinical experience regarding tumor clinicopathologic features, treatment modalities, and reproductive and oncologic outcomes in patients with non-epithelial ovarian cancer (NEOC) over 25 years. Materials and Methods: A total of 100 patients with clinicopathological diagnosis of NEOC who were treated at our tertiary care center between 1996 and 2022 were included in this retrospective cohort analysis study. Data on demographic, clinical and obstetric characteristics of patients at the time of initial diagnosis as well as tumor clinicopathologic features, treatment modalities, and oncological and reproductive outcomes were recorded. Results: NEOCs involved germ cell tumors (GCTs) in 46 (46%) patients and sex cordstromal tumors (SCSTs) in 54 (54%) patients. Thirty patients with GCTs and thirty-four patients with SCSTs possessed histological subtypes with malignant features. Most patients with GCTs (37%) and SCSTs (55.6%) had FIGO Stage 1 disease at the time of initial diagnosis. Overall, 76.6% of patients in the GCT group (n=23) underwent fertility-sparing surgery (FSS), while 76.5% of the patients in the SCST group (n=26) were treated with non-fertility-sparing surgical procedures. All patients who underwent FSS and had a recurrence in their follow-up (n=4) was stage 3 patients. Seven out of 10 patients (2 patients at stage 3 and 5 patients at stage 1) who desired pregnancy delivered between 38 and 40 gestational weeks without any congenital anomaly. The prognosis was excellent in both groups, with 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of 93.5% in GCTs and 96.3% in SCST groups. The 5-year disease-free survival was 89.1% in GCTs and 94.4% in SCSTs. FSS was not associated with worse oncologic outcomes. Conclusion: NEOCs usually have a good prognosis because they are detected at an early stage. FSS may be indicated for women of reproductive age with early-stage NEOCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.