Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37259996›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2023

Understanding the sources of error in MBAR through asymptotic analysis.

Xiang Sherry Li, Brian Van Koten, Aaron R Dinner, Erik H Thiede

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Robust Automated Truncation Point Selection for Molecular Simulations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiang Sherry LiDepartment of Chemistry and James Franck Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-1969-9567
Brian Van KotenDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0225-7550
Aaron R DinnerDepartment of Chemistry and James Franck Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8328-6427
Erik H ThiedeCenter for Computational Mathematics, Flatiron Institute, New York, New York 10010, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5666-1372

Funding

Rare-event simulation and analysis for elucidating mechanisms of development and diseaseR35GM136381 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Aaron Dinner · 2020 to 2026
$2.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136381
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many sampling strategies commonly used in molecular dynamics, such as umbrella sampling and alchemical free energy methods, involve sampling from multiple states. The Multistate Bennett Acceptance Ratio (MBAR) formalism is a widely used way of recombining the resulting data. However, the error of the MBAR estimator is not well-understood: previous error analyses of MBAR assumed independent samples. In this work, we derive a central limit theorem for MBAR estimates in the presence of correlated data, further justifying the use of MBAR in practical applications. Moreover, our central limit theorem yields an estimate of the error that can be decomposed into contributions from the individual Markov chains used to sample the states. This gives additional insight into how sampling in each state affects the overall error. We demonstrate our error estimator on an umbrella sampling calculation of the free energy of isomerization of the alanine dipeptide and an alchemical calculation of the hydration free energy of methane. Our numerical results demonstrate that the time required for the Markov chain to decorrelate in individual states can contribute considerably to the total MBAR error, highlighting the importance of accurately addressing the effect of sample correlation.

Identifiers

PMID37259996
PMCPMC10845960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.