ArticleSe pu = Chinese journal of chromatography2023
[Progress in preparation of hollow nanomaterials and their application to sample pretreatment].
Article in Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Research progress of metal-organic frameworks and their composite materials in solid-phase (micro)extraction techniques].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2026Article
- [Research progress on ionic liquid-functionalized magnetic FeSe pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2025Article
- [Research advance of solid-phase microextraction based on covalent organic framework materials].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sample pretreatment technology plays a vital role in the analysis of complex samples and is key to the entire analytical process. Its main purpose is to separate the substance to be measured from the sample matrix or interfering substances in the sample and to achieve a state in which the instrument can be analyzed and detected. Traditional sample pretreatment techniques include liquid-liquid extraction, liquid-solid extraction, precipitation separation, solvent volatilization-rotary evaporation, filtration, and centrifugation. However, the applications of these methods are limited by their low extraction efficiency, complicated operation, long time consumption, unstable recovery, use of large amounts of organic solvents, and large error rates. Several new sample pretreatment techniques, including solid-phase extraction, magnetic solid-phase extraction, solid-phase microextraction, and dispersive solid-phase extraction, have been developed and rapidly applied to various fields to overcome the shortcomings of traditional sample pretreatment methods. However, the development of adsorbent materials with high selectivity and enrichment capability remains a challenge in sample pretreatment technology, in which adsorbents with excellent adsorption performance are crucial. In recent years, various nanomaterials with remarkable properties have been introduced and applied to sample pretreatment, and numerous nano-extraction materials with diverse functions and high selectivity and enrichment capability have been developed. Hollow nanomaterials are nanoparticles with large voids in their solid shells. Owing to their advantageous properties, which include a large effective surface area, abundant internal space, low density, variety of preparation methods, structural and functional tailorability, short mass transmission path, and high carrying capacity, hollow nanomaterials show great application potential in sample pretreatment. The extraction mechanism of these materials is based on the synergistic effects of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.