SynthesisJournal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions2023
Methodological aspects of
Synthesis in Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantifying the local strain energy density distribution in the mouse tibia: the critical role of the loading direction.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2025Article
- Cortical bone adaptation response is region specific, but not peak load dependent: insights fromBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2024Article
- The loading direction dramatically affects the mechanical properties of the mouse tibia.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- A novel framework for elucidating the effect of mechanical loading on the geometry of ovariectomized mouse tibiae using principal component analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Axial loading in rodents provides a controlled setting for mechanical loading, because load and subsequent strain, frequency, number of cycles and rest insertion between cycles, are precisely defined. These methodological aspects as well as factors, such as ovariectomy, aging, and disuse may affect the outcome of the loading test, including bone mass, structure, and bone mineral density. This review aims to overview methodological aspects and modifying factors in axial loading on bone outcomes. A systematic literature search was performed in bibliographic databases until December 2021, which resulted in 2183 articles. A total of 144 articles were selected for this review: 23 rat studies, 74 mouse studies, and 47 knock out (KO) mouse studies. Results indicated that peak load, frequency, and number of loading cycles mainly affected the outcomes of bone mass, structure, and density in both rat and mouse studies. It is crucial to consider methodological parameters and modifying factors such as age, sex-steroid deficiency, and disuse in loading protocols for the prediction of loading-related bone outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37259664PMC10233220What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.