Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37259459›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Computational Chemistry for the Identification of Lead Compounds for Radiotracer Development.

Chia-Ju Hsieh, Sam Giannakoulias, E James Petersson, Robert H Mach

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Development and Optimization ofACS pharmacology & translational science · 2023
    Review
  14. Computer-Assisted Design of Peptide-Based Radiotracers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chia-Ju HsiehDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2833-7727
Sam GiannakouliasDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
E James PeterssonDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Robert H MachDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7645-2869

Funding

Medicinal Chemistry CoreU19NS110456 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ROBERT H MACH · 2019 to 2026
$44.1M
NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS110456NINDS NIH HHS U19-NS110456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of computer-aided drug design (CADD) for the identification of lead compounds in radiotracer development is steadily increasing. Traditional CADD methods, such as structure-based and ligand-based virtual screening and optimization, have been successfully utilized in many drug discovery programs and are highlighted throughout this review. First, we discuss the use of virtual screening for hit identification at the beginning of drug discovery programs. This is followed by an analysis of how the hits derived from virtual screening can be filtered and culled to highly probable candidates to test in in vitro assays. We then illustrate how CADD can be used to optimize the potency of experimentally validated hit compounds from virtual screening for use in positron emission tomography (PET). Finally, we conclude with a survey of the newest techniques in CADD employing machine learning (ML).

Indexed as

ADMETBOILED-Egg plotCADDcomputer-aided drug designdockingin silicomolecular dynamic simulationsPETpharmacophorepositron emission tomographyQSARradiopharmaceuticalradiotracervirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID37259459
PMCPMC9964981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.