Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37259427›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Application of Design of Experiments in the Development of Self-Microemulsifying Drug Delivery Systems.

Chien-Ming Hsieh, Ting-Lun Yang, Athika Darumas Putri, Chin-Tin Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Development and Optimization ofPharmaceutics · 2024
    Article
  12. Enhanced efficacy ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Feature Reviews in Pharmaceutical Technology.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chien-Ming HsiehSchool of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7204-4681
Ting-Lun YangDepartment of Biochemical Science and Technology, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106, Taiwan.
Athika Darumas PutriSchool of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-8890-0393
Chin-Tin ChenDepartment of Biochemical Science and Technology, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7439-8774

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST-111-2314-B-002-152-M3 & MOST-109-2221-E-038-001-MY3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral delivery has become the route of choice among all other types of drug administrations. However, typical chronic disease drugs are often poorly water-soluble, have low dissolution rates, and undergo first-pass metabolism, ultimately leading to low bioavailability and lack of efficacy. The lipid-based formulation offers tremendous benefits of using versatile excipients and has great compatibility with all types of dosage forms. Self-microemulsifying drug delivery system (SMEDDS) promotes drug self-emulsification in a combination of oil, surfactant, and co-surfactant, thereby facilitating better drug solubility and absorption. The feasible preparation of SMEDDS creates a promising strategy to improve the drawbacks of lipophilic drugs administered orally. Selecting a decent mixing among these components is, therefore, of importance for successful SMEDDS. Quality by Design (QbD) brings a systematic approach to drug development, and it offers promise to significantly improve the manufacturing quality performance of SMEDDS. Furthermore, it could be benefited efficiently by conducting pre-formulation studies integrated with the statistical design of experiment (DoE). In this review, we highlight the recent findings for the development of microemulsions and SMEDDS by using DoE methods to optimize the formulations for drugs in different excipients with controllable ratios. A brief overview of DoE concepts is discussed, along with its technical benefits in improving SMEDDS formulations.

Indexed as

design of experiments (DoE)oral deliveryquality by design (QbD)self-microemulsifying drug delivery system (SMEDDS)

Identifiers

PMID37259427
PMCPMC9958669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.