Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37259173›Full record

ArticleArthroplasty (London, England)2023

Predicting 30-day readmission following total knee arthroplasty using machine learning and clinical expertise applied to clinical administrative and research registry data in an Australian cohort.

Daniel J Gould, James A Bailey, Tim Spelman, Samantha Bunzli, Michelle M Dowsey, Peter F M Choong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroplasty (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Increased 30-Day Readmission Rates in Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients Using Hypoallergenic Implants.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel J GouldDepartment of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, University of Melbourne, Level 2 Clinical Sciences Building, 29 Regent Street, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia. daniel.gould@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0423-5822
James A BaileySchool of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Doug McDonell Building, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Tim SpelmanDepartment of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, University of Melbourne, Level 2 Clinical Sciences Building, 29 Regent Street, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia.
Samantha BunzliSchool of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Nathan Campus, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia.
Michelle M DowseyDepartment of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, University of Melbourne, Level 2 Clinical Sciences Building, 29 Regent Street, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia.
Peter F M ChoongDepartment of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, University of Melbourne, Level 2 Clinical Sciences Building, 29 Regent Street, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThirty-day readmission is an increasingly important problem for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. The aim of this study was to develop a risk prediction model using machine learning and clinical insight for 30-day readmission in primary TKA patients.

methodData used to train and internally validate a multivariable predictive model were obtained from a single tertiary referral centre for TKA located in Victoria, Australia. Hospital administrative data and clinical registry data were utilised, and predictors were selected through systematic review and subsequent consultation with clinicians caring for TKA patients. Logistic regression and random forest models were compared to one another. Calibration was evaluated by visual inspection of calibration curves and calculation of the integrated calibration index (ICI). Discriminative performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC).

resultsThe models developed in this study demonstrated adequate calibration for use in the clinical setting, despite having poor discriminative performance. The best-calibrated readmission prediction model was a logistic regression model trained on administrative data using risk factors identified from systematic review and meta-analysis, which are available at the initial consultation (ICI = 0.012, AUC-ROC = 0.589). Models developed to predict complications associated with readmission also had reasonable calibration (ICI = 0.012, AUC-ROC = 0.658).

conclusionDiscriminative performance of the prediction models was poor, although machine learning provided a slight improvement. The models were reasonably well calibrated, meaning they provide accurate patient-specific probabilities of these outcomes. This information can be used in shared clinical decision-making for discharge planning and post-discharge follow up.

Indexed as

Machine learningReadmissionRegistry dataTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID37259173
PMCPMC10234041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.