Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37259125›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2023

Impact of macrolide treatment on long-term mortality in patients admitted to the ICU due to CAP: a targeted maximum likelihood estimation and survival analysis.

Luis Felipe Reyes, Esteban Garcia, Elsa D Ibáñez-Prada, Cristian C Serrano-Mayorga, Yuli V Fuentes, Alejandro Rodríguez, Gerard Moreno, Alirio Bastidas, Josep Gómez, Angélica Gonzalez and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Challenges and opportunities in the management of severe pneumonia. Key concepts from the Seventh Annual Meeting of Spanish Experts 2025.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Guidelines for Antibiotics Prescription in Critically Ill Patients.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Luis Felipe Reyes *Universidad de La Sabana, Campus Puente del Común, KM 7.5 Autopista Norte de Bogotá, Chía, Colombia. luis.reyes5@unisabana.edu.co.
Esteban Garcia *Universidad de La Sabana, Campus Puente del Común, KM 7.5 Autopista Norte de Bogotá, Chía, Colombia.
Elsa D Ibáñez-PradaClínica Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia.
Cristian C Serrano-MayorgaClínica Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia.
Yuli V FuentesUniversidad de La Sabana, Campus Puente del Común, KM 7.5 Autopista Norte de Bogotá, Chía, Colombia.
Alejandro RodríguezHospital Universitari Joan XXIII, Critical Care Medicine, Rovira and Virgili University and CIBERES (Biomedical Research Network of Respiratory Disease), Tarragona, Spain.
Gerard MorenoHospital Universitari Joan XXIII, Critical Care Medicine, Rovira and Virgili University and CIBERES (Biomedical Research Network of Respiratory Disease), Tarragona, Spain.
Alirio BastidasUniversidad de La Sabana, Campus Puente del Común, KM 7.5 Autopista Norte de Bogotá, Chía, Colombia.
Josep GómezHospital Universitari Joan XXIII, Critical Care Medicine, Rovira and Virgili University and CIBERES (Biomedical Research Network of Respiratory Disease), Tarragona, Spain.
Angélica GonzalezUniversidad de La Sabana, Campus Puente del Común, KM 7.5 Autopista Norte de Bogotá, Chía, Colombia.
Christopher R FreiCollege of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Leo Anthony CeliMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.
Ignacio Martin-LoechesDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Research Organisation (MICRO), St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Grant WatererRoyal Perth Bentley Hospital Group, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Universidad de La Sabana · COHospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona · ESBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USRoyal Perth Hospital · AUSt. James's Hospital · IEThe University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Universidad de La Sabana MED-289-2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) have high mortality rates during the acute infection and up to ten years thereafter. Recommendations from international CAP guidelines include macrolide-based treatment. However, there is no data on the long-term outcomes of this recommendation. Therefore, we aimed to determine the impact of macrolide-based therapy on long-term mortality in this population.

methodsRegistered patients in the MIMIC-IV database 16 years or older and admitted to the ICU due to CAP were included. Multivariate analysis, targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) to simulate a randomised controlled trial, and survival analyses were conducted to test the effect of macrolide-based treatment on mortality six-month (6 m) and twelve-month (12 m) after hospital admission. A sensitivity analysis was performed excluding patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa or MRSA pneumonia to control for Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia (HCAP).

results3775 patients were included, and 1154 were treated with a macrolide-based treatment. The non-macrolide-based group had worse long-term clinical outcomes, represented by 6 m [31.5 (363/1154) vs 39.5 (1035/2621), p < 0.001] and 12 m mortality [39.0 (450/1154) vs 45.7 (1198/2621), p < 0.001]. The main risk factors associated with long-term mortality were Charlson comorbidity index, SAPS II, septic shock, and respiratory failure. Macrolide-based treatment reduced the risk of dying at 6 m [HR (95% CI) 0.69 (0.60, 0.78), p < 0.001] and 12 m [0.72 (0.64, 0.81), p < 0.001]. After TMLE, the protective effect continued with an additive effect estimate of - 0.069.

conclusionMacrolide-based treatment reduced the hazard risk of long-term mortality by almost one-third. This effect remains after simulating an RCT with TMLE and the sensitivity analysis for the HCAP classification.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCommunity-Acquired InfectionsMacrolidesPneumoniaAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHospitalizationHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsMacrolidesCommunity-acquired pneumoniaMacrolideMortalityβ-lactam

Identifiers

PMID37259125
PMCPMC10230128
OpenAlexW4378907734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.