Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37259093›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2023

Exploring views of members of the public and policymakers on the acceptability of population level dietary and active-travel policies: a qualitative study.

Z Toumpakari, S Valerino-Perea, K Willis, J Adams, M White, M Vasiljevic, L Ternent, J Brown, M P Kelly, C Bonell and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Z ToumpakariCentre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TZ, UK. z.toumpakari@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3476-9814
S Valerino-PereaCentre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TZ, UK.
K WillisPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
J AdamsMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
M WhiteMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
M VasiljevicFuse - Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle, UK.
L TernentFuse - Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle, UK.
J BrownDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
M P KellyDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
C BonellDepartment of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
S CumminsDepartment of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
A MajeedDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, W6 8RP, UK.
S AndersonFuse - Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle, UK.
T RobinsonFuse - Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle, UK.
V Araujo-SoaresFuse - Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle, UK.
J WatsonCentre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TZ, UK.
I SoulsbyFuse - Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle, UK.
D GreenPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
F F SniehottaFuse - Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle, UK.
R JagoCentre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TZ, UK.

Funding

Department of Health PD-SPH-2015Medical Research Council MC_UU_00006/7Medical Research Council MR/S037519/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is limited evidence on what shapes the acceptability of population level dietary and active-travel policies in England. This information would be useful in the decision-making process about which policies should be implemented and how to increase their effectiveness and sustainability. To fill this gap, we explored public and policymakers' views about factors that influence public acceptability of dietary and active-travel policies and how to increase public acceptability for these policies.

methodsWe conducted online, semi-structured interviews with 20 members of the public and 20 policymakers in England. A purposive sampling frame was used to recruit members of the public via a recruitment agency, based on age, sex, socioeconomic status and ethnicity. Policymakers were recruited from existing contacts within our research collaborations and via snowball sampling. We explored different dietary and active-travel policies that varied in their scope and focus. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic reflexive analysis with both inductive and deductive coding.

resultsWe identified four themes that informed public acceptability of dietary and active-travel policies: (1) perceived policy effectiveness, i.e., policies that included believable mechanisms of action, addressed valued co-benefits and barriers to engage in the behaviour; (2) perceived policy fairness, i.e., policies that provided everyone with an opportunity to benefit (mentioned only by the public), equally considered the needs of various population subgroups and rewarded 'healthy' behaviours rather than only penalising 'unhealthy' behaviours; (3) communication of policies, i.e., policies that were visible and had consistent and positive messages from the media (mentioned only by policymakers) and (4) how to improve policy support, with the main suggestion being an integrated strategy addressing multiple aspects of these behaviours, inclusive policies that consider everyone's needs and use of appropriate channels and messages in policy communication.

conclusionsOur findings highlight that members' of the public and policymakers' support for dietary and active-travel policies can be shaped by the perceived effectiveness, fairness and communication of policies and provide suggestions on how to improve policy support. This information can inform the design of acceptable policies but can also be used to help communicate existing and future policies to maximise their adoption and sustainability.

Indexed as

DietHealth PolicyCommunicationHumansPolicy MakingQualitative ResearchAcceptabilityActive travelDietEffectivenessFairnessPolicyPolicy communicationPublic health

Identifiers

PMID37259093
PMCPMC10230483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.