Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37259075›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2023

"Day or night, no matter what, I will go": Women's perspectives on challenges with follow-up care after cervical cancer screening in Iquitos, Peru: a qualitative study.

Rachel M Morse, Magdalena Jurczuk, Joanna Brown, Lita E Carrillo Jara, Graciela Meza, E Jennifer Ríos López, J Kathleen Tracy, Patti E Gravitt, Valerie A Paz-Soldan, Proyecto Precancer Study Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rachel M MorseDepartment of Global Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Magdalena JurczukDepartment of Global Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Joanna BrownAsociación Benéfica PRISMA, Lima, Peru.
Lita E Carrillo JaraDepartment of Cancer Control and Prevention, Dirección Regional de Salud de Loreto, Iquitos, Loreto, Peru.
Graciela MezaFacultad de Medicina Humana, Universidad Nacional de La Amazonia Peruana, Iquitos, Peru.
E Jennifer Ríos LópezAsociación Benéfica PRISMA, Lima, Peru.
J Kathleen TracyDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Patti E Gravitt *Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Valerie A Paz-Soldan *Department of Global Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA. vpazsold@tulane.edu.
Proyecto Precancer Study Group

Funding

WOMEN'S CANCERS RESEARCH PROGRAMP30CA118100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI Yolanda Sanchez · 2005 to 2026
$57.1M
Translating Molecular Diagnostics for Cervical Cancer Prevention into PracticeR01CA190366 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI PAZ-SOLDAN, VALERIE ANDREA, TRACY, J. KATHLEEN · 2016 to 2020
$2.7M
Translating Molecular Diagnostics for Cervical Cancer Prevention into PracticeU01CA190366 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI PAZ-SOLDAN, VALERIE ANDREA, TRACY, J. KATHLEEN · 2021 to 2025
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA118100NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190366NCI NIH HHS U01 CA190366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study's objective was to explore the factors associated with loss to follow-up among women with abnormal cervical cancer screening results in Iquitos, Peru from women's perspectives.

methodsIn-depth interviews were conducted with 20 screen-positive women who were referred for follow-up care but for whom evidence of follow-up was not found. Interview transcripts were thematically analyzed inductively, and the codes were then categorized using the Health Care Access Barriers Model for presentation of results.

resultsAll interviewed women were highly motivated to complete the continuum of care but faced numerous barriers along the way, including cognitive barriers such as a lack of knowledge about cervical cancer and poor communication from health professionals regarding the process, structural barriers such as challenges with scheduling appointments and unavailability of providers, and financial barriers including out-of-pocket payments and costs related to travel or missing days of work. With no information system tracking the continuum of care, we found fragmentation between primary and hospital-level care, and often, registration of women's follow-up care was missing altogether, preventing women from being able to receive proper care and providers from ensuring that women receive care and treatment as needed.

conclusionsThe challenges elucidated demonstrate the complexity of implementing a successful cervical cancer prevention program and indicate a need for any such program to consider the perspectives of women to improve follow-up after a positive screening test.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAftercareEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansLost to Follow-UpMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPeruQualitative ResearchCervical CancerLost to follow-upScreening

Identifiers

PMID37259075
PMCPMC10234072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.