Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37259069›Full record

SynthesisBMC anesthesiology2023

Protective role of nitric oxide donors on endothelium in ischemia-reperfusion injury: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Chaoxun Dou, Xue Han, Hanbin Xie, Haofeng Liao, Xue Xiao, Ziyan Huang, Gangjian Luo, Xinmin Zhang, Weifeng Yao

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chaoxun Dou *Department of Anesthesiology, The third Affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Xue Han *Department of Anesthesiology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Hanbin XieDepartment of Anesthesiology, The third Affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Haofeng LiaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The third Affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Xue XiaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The third Affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Ziyan HuangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The third Affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Gangjian LuoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The third Affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Xinmin ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China. zhangxinmin1026@jlu.edu.cn.
Weifeng YaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The third Affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China. yaowf3@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNThird Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University · CNJilin University · CNSun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDecreased bioavailability of nitric oxide (NO) under hypoxic conditions can lead to endothelial dysfunction. NO supplementation may protect endothelial function in ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury. Therefore, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to verify the protective effect of NO donors on endothelium in IR injury.

methodsMedline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to April 1, 2023. The specific inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) RCTs; (2) trials comparing NO donors with placebo control groups; and (3) trials reporting the effects of these interventions on vascular endothelial functional outcomes in IR injury. Random-effects models were used to assess pooled effect sizes, which were expressed as standardized mean differences (SMD).

resultsSeven studies satisfied the inclusion criteria and consisted of a total of 149 participants. NO donors were protective of endothelial function in IR injury (SMD: - 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: - 2.33, - 0.88, P < 0.0001; heterogeneity [I

conclusionThe short-period use of NO donors before the onset of ischemia can protect endothelial function in IR injury.

Indexed as

Nitric Oxide DonorsReperfusion InjuryEndothelium, VascularHumansNitric OxideRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicNitric OxideNitric Oxide DonorsEndotheliumFlow-meditate dilationIschemia reperfusionMeta-analysisNitric oxide donors

Identifiers

PMID37259069
PMCPMC10230692
OpenAlexW4378904364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.