Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37259066›Full record

ArticleRespiratory research2023

An ICD-Associated DAMP Gene signature predicts survival and immunotherapy response of patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

Yuxin Wu, Kexin Li, Shuang Liang, Xiaoying Lou, Yiling Li, Danfei Xu, Yue Wu, Yuan Wang, Wei Cui

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Yuxin Wu *State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Clinical Laboratory, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Kexin Li *State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Clinical Laboratory, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Shuang LiangState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Clinical Laboratory, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Xiaoying LouState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Clinical Laboratory, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Yiling LiState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Clinical Laboratory, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Danfei XuState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Clinical Laboratory, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Yue WuState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Clinical Laboratory, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Yuan WangState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Clinical Laboratory, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Wei CuiState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Clinical Laboratory, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China. cui123@cicams.ac.cn.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences(CIFMS) 2021-1-I2M-012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile some lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients benefit long-term from treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors, the sad reality is that a considerable proportion of patients do not. The classification of the LUAD tumor microenvironment (TME) can be used to conceptually comprehend primary resistance mechanisms. In addition, the most recent research demonstrates that the release of damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) in TME by immunogenic cell death (ICD) may contribute to the adaptive immune response. Currently, however, there is no such comprehensive research on this topic in LUAD patients. Therefore, we set out to investigate how to reverse the poor infiltration characteristics of immune cells and boost antitumor immunity by identifying DAMP model.

methodsIn this study, ICD-related DAMP genes were selected to investigate their effects on the prognosis of LUAD. To create a risk signature using the TCGA-LUAD cohort, the univariate COX regression and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression were carried out, and the results were verified in a GEO dataset. Subsequently, the multivariate COX regression was applied to establish a prognostic nomogram. And the ESTIMATE and ssGSEA algorithms were utilized to analyze immune activity and the TIDE algorithm was for responsiveness to immunotherapy. Moreover, clinical tissue samples were used to verify the differential expression of 9 DAMP genes in the signature.

resultsWe identified two distinct DAMP molecular subtypes, and there are remarkable differences in survival probability between the two subtypes, and patients with higher levels of DAMP-related genes are "hot tumors" with increased immune activity. In addition, 9 DAMP genes were selected as prognostic signature genes, and clinical outcomes and immunotherapy response were better for participants in the low-risk group. Importantly, according to the area under the curve (AUC) value in evaluating the efficacy of immunotherapy, this signature is superior to existing predictors, such as PD-L1 and TIDE.

conclusionsOur study suggests ICD plays an important part in modeling the TME of LUAD patients. And this signature could be utilized as a reliable predictor to estimate clinical outcomes and predict immunotherapy efficacy among LUAD patients.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungLung NeoplasmsAlgorithmsHumansImmunogenic Cell DeathImmunotherapyPrognosisTumor MicroenvironmentDamage-associated molecular patternsImmunogenic cell deathImmunotherapyLung adenocarcinomaPrognosisSignature

Identifiers

PMID37259066
PMCPMC10230791
OpenAlexW4378882634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.