Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37259029›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2023

Patient-provider communication about cognition and the role of memory concerns: a descriptive study.

Nikki L Hill, Emily Bratlee-Whitaker, Heejung Jang, Sakshi Bhargava, Andrea Yevchak Sillner, Justin Do, Jacqueline Mogle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Primary care determinants for timely diagnosis of dementia.Family medicine and community health · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Psychological Stress and Cognitive Brain Health: Policies to Reduce Dementia Risk.Policy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nikki L HillRoss and Carol Nese College of Nursing, Penn State University, 201 Nursing Sciences Building, University Park, PA, 16802, USA. nikki.hill@psu.edu.
Emily Bratlee-WhitakerRTI Health Solutions, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, PO Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.
Heejung JangDepartment of Psychology, Clemson University, 418 Brackett Hall, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA.
Sakshi BhargavaRTI Health Solutions, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, PO Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.
Andrea Yevchak SillnerRoss and Carol Nese College of Nursing, Penn State University, 201 Nursing Sciences Building, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Justin DoSidney Kimmel Medical College, 1025 Walnut St, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Jacqueline MogleDepartment of Psychology, Clemson University, 418 Brackett Hall, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA.

Funding

Improving assessment of subjective memory impairment for detecting Alzheimer's disease: A coordinated analysis in two measurement burst studiesR01AG062605 · NIA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI MOGLE, JACQUELINE · 2019 to 2022
$1.6M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG062605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly identification of cognitive impairment is an important part of health promotion in aging. However, many older adults do not seek help for cognitive problems until their ability to function independently is substantially impacted. The purpose of this descriptive study was to explore older adults' experiences with patient-provider communication specific to cognition as well as compare barriers and facilitators between those with and without memory concerns.

methodsWe conducted an online survey with individuals aged 65 + years (n = 409; mean age = 71.4(4.73); 54% female; 79% non-Hispanic White), purposively sampled to include those with and without memory concerns. Questionnaires included measures of subjective memory decline (SMD), memory concerns, past healthcare experiences, as well as open-ended questions regarding patient-provider communication about cognition. Content analysis was used to code open-ended responses. Logistic regression was used to examine differences in facilitators and barriers to communication among three groups: no SMD (n = 130), SMD without memory concerns (n = 143), and SMD with memory concerns (n = 136).

resultsOnly 16.6% of participants reported discussing cognition with a healthcare provider. Of the remaining 83.4%, approximately two-thirds would be open to such discussions in certain circumstances, most frequently if they had worsening memory problems. Over half of participants reported that their provider had never offered cognitive testing. Compared to the no SMD and SMD without memory concerns groups, participants reporting SMD with memory concerns were more likely to: (1) discuss cognition if their healthcare provider initiated the conversation, and (2) avoid discussions of cognitive problems due to fears of losing independence.

conclusionsWe found that most participants, including those reporting SMD with memory concerns, had never discussed cognition with their healthcare providers. Patient-reported barriers and facilitators to communication about cognition differed in several areas based on SMD status and the presence or absence of memory concerns. Consideration of these differences can guide future efforts to improve early identification of subtle cognitive changes that would benefit from further monitoring or intervention.

Indexed as

CognitionCognitive DysfunctionAgedAgingCommunicationFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesCognitionHelp-seekingMemory complaintsPatient-provider communicationSubjective cognition

Identifiers

PMID37259029
PMCPMC10233998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.