Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37258892›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2023

Talker adaptation or "talker" adaptation? Musical instrument variability impedes pitch perception.

Anya E Shorey, Caleb J King, Rachel M Theodore, Christian E Stilp

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anya E ShoreyDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, 317 Life Sciences Building, Louisville, KY, 40272, USA. anya.shorey@louisville.edu.
Caleb J KingDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, 317 Life Sciences Building, Louisville, KY, 40272, USA.
Rachel M TheodoreDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Connecticut, 2 Alethia Drive, Unit 1085, Storrs, CT, 06269-1085, USA.
Christian E StilpDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, 317 Life Sciences Building, Louisville, KY, 40272, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Listeners show perceptual benefits (faster and/or more accurate responses) when perceiving speech spoken by a single talker versus multiple talkers, known as talker adaptation. While near-exclusively studied in speech and with talkers, some aspects of talker adaptation might reflect domain-general processes. Music, like speech, is a sound class replete with acoustic variation, such as a multitude of pitch and instrument possibilities. Thus, it was hypothesized that perceptual benefits from structure in the acoustic signal (i.e., hearing the same sound source on every trial) are not specific to speech but rather a general auditory response. Forty nonmusician participants completed a simple musical task that mirrored talker adaptation paradigms. Low- or high-pitched notes were presented in single- and mixed-instrument blocks. Reflecting both music research on pitch and timbre interdependence and mirroring traditional "talker" adaptation paradigms, listeners were faster to make their pitch judgments when presented with a single instrument timbre relative to when the timbre was selected from one of four instruments from trial to trial. A second experiment ruled out the possibility that participants were responding faster to the specific instrument chosen as the single-instrument timbre. Consistent with general theoretical approaches to perception, perceptual benefits from signal structure are not limited to speech.

Indexed as

MusicSpeech PerceptionHearingHearing TestsHumansPitch PerceptionMusical instrumentsMusic perceptionPitchSpeech perceptionTalker adaptation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.