Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37258794›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Effects of acute psychosocial stress on source level EEG power and functional connectivity measures.

Gert Vanhollebeke, Mitchel Kappen, Rudi De Raedt, Chris Baeken, Pieter van Mierlo, Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gert VanhollebekeDepartment of Head and Skin, Ghent Experimental Psychiatry (GHEP) Lab, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, Entrance 12 - Floor 13, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. gert.vanhollebeke@ugent.be.
Mitchel KappenDepartment of Head and Skin, Ghent Experimental Psychiatry (GHEP) Lab, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, Entrance 12 - Floor 13, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Rudi De RaedtDepartment of Head and Skin, Ghent Experimental Psychiatry (GHEP) Lab, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, Entrance 12 - Floor 13, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Chris BaekenDepartment of Head and Skin, Ghent Experimental Psychiatry (GHEP) Lab, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, Entrance 12 - Floor 13, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Pieter van MierloMedical Image and Signal Processing Group (MEDISIP), Department of Electronics and Information Systems, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Marie-Anne VanderhasseltDepartment of Head and Skin, Ghent Experimental Psychiatry (GHEP) Lab, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, Entrance 12 - Floor 13, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University Hospital · BEGhent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The usage of EEG to uncover the influence of psychosocial stressors (PSSs) on neural activity has gained significant attention throughout recent years, but the results are often troubled by confounding stressor types. To investigate the effect of PSSs alone on neural activity, we employed a paradigm where participants are exposed to negative peer comparison as PSS, while other possible stressors are kept constant, and compared this with a condition where participants received neutral feedback. We analyzed commonly used sensor level EEG indices (frontal theta, alpha, and beta power) and further investigated whether source level power and functional connectivity (i.e., the temporal dependence between spatially seperated brain regions) measures, which have to our knowledge not yet been used, are more sensitive to PSSs than sensor level-derived EEG measures. Our results show that on sensor level, no significant frontal power changes are present (all p's > 0.16), indicating that sensor level frontal power measures are not sensitive enough to be affected by only PSSs. On source level, we find increased alpha power (indicative of decreased cortical activity) in the left- and right precuneus and right posterior cingulate cortex (all p's < 0.03) and increased functional connectivity between the left- and right precuneus (p < 0.001), indicating that acute, trial based PSSs lead to decreased precuneus/PCC activity, and possibly indicates a temporary disruption in the self-referential neural processes of an individual.

Indexed as

BrainGyrus CinguliBrain MappingElectroencephalographyHumansStress, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID37258794
PMCPMC10232584
OpenAlexW4378901626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.