Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37258782›Full record

ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2023

Potency Assays: The 'Bugaboo' of Stem Cell Therapy.

Sílvia Torrents, Marta Grau-Vorster, Joaquim Vives

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 85% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sílvia TorrentsBanc de Sang i Teixits, Edifici Dr. Frederic Duran i Jordà, Barcelona, Spain.
Marta Grau-VorsterBanc de Sang i Teixits, Edifici Dr. Frederic Duran i Jordà, Barcelona, Spain.
Joaquim VivesBanc de Sang i Teixits, Edifici Dr. Frederic Duran i Jordà, Barcelona, Spain. jvives@bst.cat.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substantially manipulated cell-based products for human use are considered medicines and therefore regulatory authorities require extensive characterisation in terms of identity, purity and potency. The latter critical quality attribute is probably the most challenging to identify and measure, requiring provision that potency assays should reflect the intended mechanism of action and demonstrate the drugs' biological effect. However, in most cases, the mechanisms involved are not fully understood, making the definition and validation of suitable potency tests difficult, a 'bugaboo' quest to be feared. Although it is evident that much work is still needed in the scientific arena, the present chapter focuses on strategies currently used by developers of cell- and gene-based therapies to demonstrate potency of innovative medicines, the regulatory framework and need for standardisation seeking to demystify critical factors to consider when designing a potency assay.

Indexed as

Genetic TherapyStem Cell TransplantationCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyHumansReference StandardsCritical quality attributesGene therapyMarketing approvalPotencyProduct developmentQuality and regulatory complianceSomatic cell therapySuitable potency assaySurrogate potency assayTissue engineering products

Identifiers

PMID37258782
OpenAlexW4378804958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.