ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023
A novel 5-gene prognostic signature to improve risk stratification of cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Solute carrier-correlated gene signature in predicting the prognosis and immunity in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- High expression of malic enzyme 1 predicts adverse prognosis in patients with cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukaemia and promotes leukaemogenesis through the IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 pathways.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposePrognostic prediction is a challenging task in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML) patients. In this study, we aimed at developing a novel prognostic signature to predict and stratify the survival of CN-AML patients.
methodsUsing a training dataset (GSE12417), 5-gene prognostic signature was established to predict survival of CN-AML patients. The prognostic performance of this prognostic signature was further validated in testing dataset (TCGA CN-AML cohort) and validation dataset (GSE6891 CN-AML cohort).
resultsIn training, testing and validation datasets, the increased 5-gene risk score was significantly related with inferior overall survival (OS) of patients, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) demonstrated that our prognostic signature had overall prediction accuracy. The excellent prognostic value of the 5-gene prognostic signature was also supported by the comparison with three previously proposed prognostic models. For the intermediate-risk CN-AML patients and the CN-AML patients with FLT3 or NPM1 mutation, our model could also well dichotomize them into two subgroups with distinct prognosis. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that 5-gene risk score was the only independent risk factor in TCGA CN-AML cohort. Nomogram including the 5-gene risk score performed well in predicting 1-year, 2-year and 3-year OS.
conclusionIn summary, our novel 5-gene prognostic signature facilitated the improvement in risk stratification of CN-AML patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.