Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37258633›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Improving the efficiency of RMSProp optimizer by utilizing Nestrove in deep learning.

Reham Elshamy, Osama Abu-Elnasr, Mohamed Elhoseny, Samir Elmougy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Reham ElshamyFaculty of Computers and Information, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt. reham_elshamy@oi.edu.eg.
Osama Abu-ElnasrFaculty of Computers and Information, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Mohamed ElhosenyFaculty of Computers and Information, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Samir ElmougyFaculty of Computers and Information, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are several methods that have been discovered to improve the performance of Deep Learning (DL). Many of these methods reached the best performance of their models by tuning several parameters such as Transfer Learning, Data augmentation, Dropout, and Batch Normalization, while other selects the best optimizer and the best architecture for their model. This paper is mainly concerned with the optimization algorithms in DL. It proposes a modified version of Root Mean Squared Propagation (RMSProp) algorithm, called NRMSProp, to improve the speed of convergence, and to find the minimum of the loss function quicker than the original RMSProp optimizer. Moreover, NRMSProp takes the original algorithm, RMSProp, a step further by using the advantages of Nesterov Accelerated Gradient (NAG). It also takes in consideration the direction of the gradient at the next step, with respect to the history of the previous gradients, and adapts the value of the learning rate. As a result, this modification helps NRMSProp to convergence quicker than the original RMSProp, without any increase in the complexity of the RMSProp. In this work, many experiments had been conducted to evaluate the performance of NRMSProp with performing several tests with deep Convolution Neural Networks (CNNs) using different datasets on RMSProp, Adam, and NRMSProp optimizers. The experimental results showed that NRMSProp has achieved effective performance, and accuracy up to 0.97 in most cases, in comparison to RMSProp and Adam optimizers, without any increase in the complexity of the algorithm and with fine amount of memory and time.

Identifiers

PMID37258633
PMCPMC10232429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.