ArticleScientific reports2023
Prediction of electrostatic properties of reservoir rock in low salinity water injection into carbonate reservoirs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanistic Modeling of Zwitterionic Surfactant Adsorption on Mineral Surfaces: A Three-Step Isotherm with Micelle-Induced Desorption.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2025Article
- Comprehensive experimental study of multivariable oil-brine-rock interactions: impact of brine-rock chemistry and crude oil polarity on enhanced oil recovery in carbonate reservoirs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Geochemical modeling along with chemical reactions is one of the challenges in modeling of low salinity water injection. The most important issue in the geochemical model is to determine the correct electrical charge distribution model and its tuning parameters. The composition of the rock as well as the candidate water used is effective in determining the type of model and its parameters, so that the tuning parameters are determined based on the history of zeta potential experiments. In this study, in order to determine the correct model of electrical charge distribution and its tuning parameters in carbonate rock samples, first, equilibrium samples of Candidate water with crushed rock are subjected to static zeta potential tests. Then, the diffuse electrical double layer model is used to determine the electrical charge of the rock/water and water/oil surfaces and to predict the zeta potential. In the following, by adjusting the tuning parameters of the model to match the prediction results of the model with the history of the laboratory data, the density of the carbonate rock surface, the equilibrium constants and the kinetics of the governing reactions are determined. The obtained results show that the range of error in zeta potential prediction by the model compared to the laboratory data is from 2 to 20%, which is within the acceptable range of the performance of electrical charge distribution models. Moreover, it could be observed that the error of prediction using DLM model is significantly less than the conventional models (CD-MUSIC and BSM) for different candidate water. Finally, the effect of calculated zeta potential changes is used to calculate the contact angle changes of low salinity water injection based on the coupling of DLVO theory and geochemical model. The results of the study prove that the prediction error is less than 5% compared to the results of the static wettability tests. Based on this, according to the good match between the model and the laboratory results, it is possible to determine the properties of surface sites in surface complexation models of carbonate samples using the proposed approach and the subsequent tuning data of the geochemical model.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.