ArticleJournal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis2023
Five-Year Prognostic Value of DAPT Score in Older Patients undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Large-Sample Study in the Real World.
Article in Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictors of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC geriatrics · 2024Pooled it
- Predictors of Short- and Long-Term Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Cohort Study on the Data of National Persian Registry of Cardiovascular Disease (N-PROVE).Health science reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Antiplatelet Therapy for Elderly Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) score is recommended for predicting the risk of ischemia and bleeding for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aimed to investigate the long-term prognostic value of the DAPT score in older PCI patients.
methodsThis study enrolled 10,724 consecutive patients who underwent PCI from January 2013 to December 2013 in Fu Wai hospital, among whom 2,981 (27.8%) were aged ≥ 65 years. The ischemic endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE, including myocardial infarction, all-cause death, and stroke). The bleeding endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 2, 3, or 5 bleeding.
resultsAfter a 5-year follow-up, 256 (12.0%) MACCEs and 53 (2.5%) BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding occurred. The patients were divided into two groups according to the DAPT score: the low-score (＜2, n=1,646) and high-score (≥ 2, n=485) group. Multivariate Cox regression revealed that the risk of MACCE was similar between the two groups [hazard ratio (HR): 1.214, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.916-1.609, P=0.178], whereas the risk of bleeding was significantly higher in the high-score group than in the low-score group (HR: 2.447, 95% CI: 1.407-4.257, P=0.002). The DAPT score did not show prognostic value in MACCE [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), 0.534; 95% CI: 0.496-0.572, P=0.079]; however, it demonstrated a certain prognostic value in BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding (AUROC, 0.646; 95% CI: 0.573-0.719, P＜0.001).
conclusionThis study suggested that in older PCI patients, the DAPT score did not show predictive value for MACCE; however, it had a certain predictive value for 5-year BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.